Alley cropping with strawberries: Two case-studies in Romania

Valeriu Norocel Nicolescu ,
Valeriu Norocel Nicolescu
Cornelia Hernea ,
Cornelia Hernea
Vilhelm Sandi
Vilhelm Sandi

Published: 28.12.2018.

Volume 3, Issue 2 (2018)

pp. 31-40;

https://doi.org/10.21750/refor.6.03.56

Abstract

The paper focuses on the use of alley cropping, an arable agroforestry system comprising rows of trees planted with a companion crop grown in the alleyways between the rows, in two sub-compartments (81B%: 0.75 ha, elevation 715 m asl; 81E: 3.4 ha, elevation 735 m asl) artificially regenerated at 1.80 m x 1.60 m spacing in the south-east of Transylvania (Romania) in 1997 (81B%) and 2003 (81E). The climate (Dfbx, specific to low and middle mountains) and soil (luvisol, of moderate fertility for pure or mixed Quercus petraea stands) are only moderately favourable to strawberry culture. The rows of tree species consists of Quercus rubra, Acer pseudoplatanus, Prunus avium (81B%), and Quercus petraea, Fagus sylvatica, Acer pseudoplatanus, and Larix decidua (81E). Strawberries (variety Elsanta,) were planted at 60 x 60 cm spacing in two pure rows in-between the tree rows as well as within the rows of planted trees. Both plantations were fenced, with manual topsoil hoeing up to four times a year, lighly fertilized (N, P, K complex) and chemically protected against browsing and pests. Strawberry rotation (six years, of which five years - two to six - with fruit production) was longer than the one (maximum three years) recommended in pure crops. Strawberry production reached the maximum level in years 3 or 4. Under the local conditions, the alley cropping with strawberries had demonstrated to be a viable alternative to the 'classical' monocropping system in terms of (a) survival rate of plants (over 95 per cent), (b) initial height growth of plants (very quick, resulting from reduced competition with grasses and naturally regenerated forest trees such as pioneer species), (c) establishment of a new forest culture, the full forest cover being achieved immediately after the end of strawberry production, as well as (d) economics (early and relevant revenue from the crop).

Keywords

References

Monografia geografică a R. (1960). Editura Academiei R.P.R.
Chamberlin, J. (2016). Developing low-cost planting materials and establishment methods to accelerate agroforestry adoption for function and profit. Cropping Systems & Soil fertility, Minnesota Department of Agriculture. 71–75.
Ingram, V., Jans, W., Hitimana, J., Werners, S., Spijkerman, A., Froebrich, J., Ndolo, B., Heesmans, H., & Rooker, J. (2017). Agroforestry systems in the Upper Mara River Basin : a practical guide for farmers. Wageningen University & Research. https://doi.org/10.18174/428431
Mcadam, J., Burgess, P., Graves, P., Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., A, & Mr, M.-L. (2009). Classifications and functions of agroforestry systems in Europe. 21–41.
Mihăilă, E., Costăchescu, C., & Dănescu, F. (2012). Sisteme agrosilvice. Revista de Silvicultură Și Cinegetică, 30, 59–66.
Mosquera-Losada, M., Mcadam, J., Romero-Franco, R., Santiago-Freijanes, J., & Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A. (2009). Definitions and Components of Agroforestry Practices in Europe. 3–19.
Mosquera-Losada, M. R., Moreno, G., Pardini, A., McAdam, J. H., Papanastasis, V., Burgess, P. J., Lamersdorf, N., Castro, M., Liagre, F., & Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A. (2012). Past, Present and Future of Agroforestry Systems in Europe. In Advances in Agroforestry (pp. 285–312). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4676-3_16
Petrillo, M., & Herzog, F. (2016).
Schwab, N., Schickhoff, U., & Fischer, E. (2015). Transition to agroforestry significantly improves soil quality: A case study in the central mid-hills of Nepal. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 205, 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.004
Smith, J. (2010). The History of Temperate Agroforestry. Progressive Farming Trust Limited.
Tellström, S. (2014). Urban agroforestry for developing ecosystem services in urban forests. Bachelor’s thesis. 39.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles