Stock types used in reforestation projects can influence plantation success, as they determine the morphological attributes of the planted seedlings. They can also interact with silviculture treatments to influence early seedling survival and growth. As nurseries develop and produce new stock types in response to –and in interaction with– manager needs, research efforts must be pursued to validate early seedling performance and long-term growth and yields. In this context, we aimed to evaluate the main and interactive effects of mechanical site preparation and stock type on planted black (Picea mariana [Mill.] BSP) and white spruce (P. glauca [Moench.] Voss) seedling dimensions at 16-y, and estimate the long-term impact of stock type on the merchantable volume at rotation age for white spruce. We hence compared medium (200 cm3 root plug) and large (350 cm3 root plug) containerized seedlings, as well as large bare-root seedlings of both species, in a field experiment established in Quebec (Canada), where there is a ban on the use of chemical herbicides for vegetation management treatments. Our results confirm that there is a significant, although limited impact of stock type on the size of black and white spruce at the juvenile stage, when medium and large stock types are compared, but that these small differences have a negligible effect on the estimated merchantable volume produced at rotation age (60 years). Mechanical site preparation does not promote seedling growth on these rich sites with thin humus. Therefore, selection of a medium or larger stock type for reforestation projects and application of mechanical site preparation in ecosystems similar to the one studied here should be based on other considerations than growth and yield, such as seedling availability, production and planting costs, or operational constraints.
Larouche. (n.d.). Denise Tousignant and Nathalie Langlois provided constructive advice on an earlier version of this manuscript. This study was funded by the Ministère des Forêts.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Beguin, J., Tremblay, J., Thiffault, N., Pothier, D., & Côté, S. D. (2016). Management of forest regeneration in boreal and temperate deer–forest systems: challenges, guidelines, and research gaps. Ecosphere, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1488
Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., & White, J.-S. S. (2009). Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(3), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
Dumroese, R. K., Landis, T. D., Pinto, J. R., Haase, D. L., Wilkinson, K. W., & Davis, A. S. (2025). Meeting Forest Restoration Challenges: Using the Target Plant Concept. REFORESTA, 1, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.21750/refor.1.03.3
Faure-Lacroix, J., Tremblay, J.-P., Thiffault, N., & Roy, V. (2013). Stock type performance in addressing top-down and bottom-up factors for the restoration of indigenous trees. Forest Ecology and Management, 307, 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.031
Gravel, J., Beaupré, P., Latrémouille, I., Barrette, M., Bédard, S., Gauthier, M., Guillemette, F., Hébert, F., Larouche, C., Prégent, G., Prévost, M., Raymond, P., Thiffault, N., & Tremblay, S. (2016). Fiches d’aide à la décision pour les traitements sylvicoles au Québec. Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs, Direction de l’aménagement et de l’environnement forestiers and Direction de la recherche forestière.
Québec, Q. (n.d.).
Grossnickle, S. (2000). Ecophysiology of Northern Spruce Species. The Performance of Planted Seedlings.
Grossnickle, S. (2005). How big is big enough? The Thin Green Line: A symposium on the state-of-the-art in reforestation.
Grossnickle, S. C., & El-Kassaby, Y. A. (2015). Bareroot versus container stocktypes: a performance comparison. New Forests, 47(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-015-9476-6
Hebert, F., Boucher, J.-F., Walsh, D., Tremblay, P., Cote, D., & Lord, D. (2013). Black spruce growth and survival in boreal open woodlands 10 years following mechanical site preparation and planting. Forestry, 87(2), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpt052
Jobidon, R., Roy, V., & Cyr, G. (2003). Net effect of competing vegetation on selected environmental conditions and performance of four spruce seedling stock sizes after eight years in Qu�bec (Canada). Annals of Forest Science, 60(7), 691–699. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2003063
Laflèche, V., Ruel, J.-C., & Archambault, L. (2000). Évaluation de la coupe avec protection de la régénération et des sols comme méthode de régénération de peuplements mélangés du domaine bioclimatique de la sapinière à bouleau jaune de l’est du Québec, Canada. The Forestry Chronicle, 76(4), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc76653-4
Ellen Macdonald, S., G. Schmidt, M., & Rothwell, R. L. (1998). Impacts of mechanical site preparation on foliar nutrients of planted white spruce seedlings on mixed-wood boreal forest sites in Alberta. Forest Ecology and Management, 110(1–3), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(98)00272-2
Örlander, G., Gemmel, P., & Hunt, J. (1990). Site Preparation: A Swedish Overview. FRDA Report.
Pinto, J. R., Marshall, J. D., Dumroese, R. K., Davis, A. S., & Cobos, D. R. (2012). Photosynthetic response, carbon isotopic composition, survival, and growth of three stock types under water stress enhanced by vegetative competition. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 42(2), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1139/x11-189
Pinto, J. R., McNassar, B. A., Kildisheva, O. A., & Davis, A. S. (2018). Stocktype and Vegetative Competition Influences on Pseudotsuga menziesii and Larix occidentalis Seedling Establishment. Forests, 9(5), 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9050228
Prégent, G. (1998). Direction de la recherche forestière, Ministère des Ressources naturelles. Mémoire de recherche forestière n o 133.
Prégent, G., Picher, G., & Auger, I. (2010). Tarif de cubage, tables de rendement et modèles de croissance pour les plantations d’épinette blanche au Québec. Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune, Direction de la recherche forestière.
Prescott, C. E., Maynard, D. G., & Laiho, R. (2000). Humus in northern forests: friend or foe? Forest Ecology and Management, 133(1–2), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(99)00295-9
Prévost, M. (1992). Effets du scarifiage sur les propriétés du sol, la croissance des semis et la compétition : revue des connaissances actuelles et perspectives de recherches au Québec. Annales Des Sciences Forestières, 49(3), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19920306
Core, T. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
Robitaille, A., & Saucier, J. (1998).
Salmon, D. (2018).
Saucier, J., Robitaille, A., & Grondin, P. (2009). Manuel de foresterie, 2 nd edition. Ordre Des Ingénieurs Forestiers Du Québec. Éditions Multimondes.
The Canadian System of Soil Classification. 3 rd edition. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. (1998). 1646.
Ottawa, O. (n.d.).
South, D. B., & Rakestraw, J. L. (2004). Large-Diameter Seedlings. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 18(4), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1300/j091v18n04_03
South, D. B., Zwolinski, J. B., & Donald, D. G. M. (1993). Interactions among seedling diameter grade, weed control, and soil cultivation for Pinusradiata in South Africa. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23(10), 2078–2082. https://doi.org/10.1139/x93-259
Thiffault, N. (2004). Stock type in intensive silviculture: A (short) discussion about roots and size. The Forestry Chronicle, 80(4), 463–468. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc80463-4
Thiffault, N., Cyr, G., Prégent, G., Jobidon, R., & Charette, L. (2004). Régénération artificielle des pessières noires à éricacées : effets du scarifiage, de la fertilisation et du type de plants après 10 ans. The Forestry Chronicle, 80(1), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc80141-1
Thiffault, N., & Hébert, F. (2013). Tome 2 -Les concepts et l’application de la sylviculture.
Thiffault, N., Chalifour, D., & Bélanger, L. (2013). Enrichment planting of Picea glauca in boreal mixedwoods: can localized site preparation enhance early seedling survival and growth? New Forests, 44(4), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9361-5
Thiffault, N., & Jobidon, R. (2005). Existe-t-il une interaction entre le type de plants et le scarifiage? Le cas des PMD et des PFD d’épinettes. Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune, Direction de la recherche forestière. Note de Recherche Forestière n o.
(N.d.). Reforesta Scientific Society.
Thiffault, N., Jobidon, R., & Munson, A. D. (2003). Performance and physiology of large containerized and bare-root spruce seedlings in relation to scarification and competition in Qu�bec (Canada). Annals of Forest Science, 60(7), 645–655. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2003057
Thiffault, N., & Roy, V. (2010). Living without herbicides in Québec (Canada): historical context, current strategy, research and challenges in forest vegetation management. European Journal of Forest Research, 130(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0373-4
Thiffault, N., Hébert, F., & Jobidon, R. (2012). Planted Picea mariana growth and nutrition as influenced by silviculture x nursery interactions on an ericaceous-dominated site. Silva Fennica, 46(5). https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.918
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
