More articles from Volume 1, Issue 1, 2016
Opening Letter
Restoration Silviculture: An Ecophysiological Perspective - Lessons learned across 40 years
Meeting Forest Restoration Challenges: Using the Target Plant Concept
Restoration of Spanish pine plantations: A main challenge for the 21st century
Reforestation challenges in Scandinavia
Citations
11
Ivan Repáč, Zuzana Parobeková, Matúš Sendecký
(2017)
Reforestation in Slovakia: History, current practice and perspectives
REFORESTA, (3)
10.21750/REFOR.3.07.31
Elisabeth Wallin, Daniel Gräns, Eva Stattin, Nathalie Verhoef, Grzegorz Mikusiński, Anders Lindström
(2019)
Evaluating methods for storability assessment and determination of vitality status of container grown Norway spruce transplants after frozen storage
Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 34(6)
10.1080/02827581.2019.1622036
Marco Hernandez Velasco
(2020)
Treatments for induction of cold hardiness inPicea abies(L.) Karst. andPinus sylvestrisL. seedlings pre-cultivated under light-emitting diodes – impact of photoperiod and temperature including energy consumption and seedling quality after cold storage
Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 35(1-2)
10.1080/02827581.2020.1718199
Johanna Riikonen
(2017)
Content of far-red light in supplemental light modified characteristics related to drought tolerance and post-planting growth in Scots pine seedlings
Forest Ecology and Management, 390()
10.1016/j.foreco.2017.01.015
Samieh Eskandari, Ali Mohammadi, Maria Sandberg, Rolf Lutz Eckstein, Kjell Hedberg, Karin Granström
(2019)
Hydrochar-Amended Substrates for Production of Containerized Pine Tree Seedlings under Different Fertilization Regimes
Agronomy, 9(7)
10.3390/agronomy9070350
Michal Lalík, Juraj Galko, Andrej Kunca, Christo Nikolov, Slavomír Rell, Milan Zúbrik, Marcel Dubec, Jozef Vakula, Andrej Gubka, Roman Leontovyč, Valéria Longauerová, Bohdan Konôpka, Jaroslav Holuša
(2021)
Ecology, management and damage by the large pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in coniferous forests within Europe
Central European Forestry Journal, 67(2)
10.2478/forj-2021-0005
Ditte Arp Jensen, Jens‐Christian Svenning
(2021)
Population ecology and dynamics of a remnant natural population of European yew Taxus baccata in a lowland temperate forest – implications for use in reforestation
Nordic Journal of Botany, 39(5)
10.1111/njb.03167
Muhammad Azeem, Zafar Iqbal, S. Noushin Emami, Göran Nordlander, Henrik Nordenhem, Raimondas Mozūratis, Hesham R. El‐Seedi, Anna Karin Borg‐Karlson
(2020)
Chemical composition and antifeedant activity of some aromatic plants against pine weevil (Hylobius abietis)
Annals of Applied Biology, 177(1)
10.1111/aab.12586
Marco Hernandez Velasco
(2021)
Enabling Year-round Cultivation in the Nordics-Agrivoltaics and Adaptive LED Lighting Control of Daily Light Integral
Agriculture, 11(12)
10.3390/agriculture11121255
Kristina Berggren, Michelle Nordkvist, Christer Björkman, Helena Bylund, Maartje J. Klapwijk, Adriana Puentes
(2023)
Synergistic effects of methyl jasmonate treatment and propagation method on Norway spruce resistance against a bark-feeding insect
Frontiers in Plant Science, 14()
10.3389/fpls.2023.1165156
E. Mangwende, P.W. Chirwa, T.A.S. Aveling
(2020)
Evaluation of seed treatments against Colletotrichum kahawae subsp. cigarro on Eucalyptus spp.
Crop Protection, 132()
10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105113Reforestation challenges in Scandinavia
Abstract
In the keynote, major reforestation challenges in Scandinavia will be highlighted. The following countries make up Scandinavia: Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark. For Iceland, with only a forest cover of 2%, a major reforestation challenge is the deforestation and overgrazing in combination with land degradation and extensive soil erosion. The challenges include the conflicts with livestock farmers. For centuries the commons were used for sheep and horse grazing. However, more and more of farmer grazing land have been fenced up, allowing the regeneration of birch and plantations of other species to increase. With a forest cover of 37% and 69% respectively, for decades a major reforestation challenge in Norway and Sweden has been the risk of seedling damages from the pine weevil. Unprotected seedlings can have a survival rate of less than 25% after being planted. Pine weevils feed on the bark of planted young seedlings at regeneration sites. If the seedling is girdled, it will not survive. In Sweden, and soon in Norway, pesticides have been forbidden. In the keynote, new methods and technology will be presented based on non-chemical protection. In Finland, with a forest cover of 75%, a major reforestation challenge is linked to the forest structure. The structure of Finnish forestry includes many private forests in combination with small regeneration sites. This implies a situation where logistics and methods for lifting and field storage provide a major challenge in order to preserve seedling quality until the planting date. Due to this situation, new logistic systems and technologies are being developed in Finland, including new seedling cultivation programs (including cultivation under Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs)) to match the access of fresh planting stock to different planting dates. In Denmark, with a forest cover of 13%, a major reforestation challenge is the possibility of future plantations based on a wide range of relevant species. For this to become a realistic option, new methods and technology have to be developed in reforestation activities that support this possibility. These methods and technology should make it possible to not be limited to certain species due to problems and restrictions during field establishment. This due to the prospect of establishing stable, healthy, and productive stands of various forest species that can be adapted to future climate change.
Keywords
References
Citation
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
