Issue image

More articles from Volume 6, Issue 2, 2021

Forests in Women’s Hands - brief information

Two studies of the potential of drought preconditioning to enhance deep root production in seedlings of western larch (Larix occidentalis)

The first report of Ochrospora ariae and Septoria sorbi on whitebeam (Sorbus aria) seedlings in Montenegro

Early pine root anatomy and primary and lateral root formation are affected by container size: implications in dry-summer climates

Restoration of degraded forest reserves in Ghana

Citations

Crossref Logo

3

Crossref Logo

Steven C. Grossnickle, Joanne E. MacDonald

(2026)

Seedling field performance on hot, dry forest restoration sites: influence of plant attributes

New Forests, 57(2)

10.1007/s11056-025-10140-7

Crossref Logo

Youssef Dallahi, Amal Boujraf, Abdelaziz Smouni, Mouna Fahr, Ahmed El Aboudi, Collins Ashianga Orlando, Kamal Laabou, Abderrahim Ferradous, Mohamed Mahmoud Ould Abidine

(2024)

Effects of container size and growing media on growth of argan (Argania spinosa) seedlings in Morocco

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 54()

10.33494/nzjfs542024x285x

Crossref Logo

Dušan Jokanović, Vesna Nikolić Jokanović, Kristina Živanović, Milica Ilić, Nevena Antanasijević, Filip Jovanović

(2024)

Morpho-anatomical traits of one-year-old Quercus sp. seedlings cultivated in the same container

REFORESTA, (18)

10.21750/REFOR.18.02.118

Early pine root anatomy and primary and lateral root formation are affected by container size: implications in dry-summer climates

Antonio Montagnoli Orcid logo ,
Antonio Montagnoli
Donato Chiatante ,
Donato Chiatante
Anastazija Dimitrova ,
Anastazija Dimitrova
Mattia Terzaghi Orcid logo ,
Mattia Terzaghi
Jeremiah R. Pinto ,
Jeremiah R. Pinto
R. Kasten Dumroese Orcid logo
R. Kasten Dumroese

Published: 30.12.2021.

Volume 6, Issue 2 (2021)

pp. 20-34;

https://doi.org/10.21750/refor.12.04.96

Abstract

Although the presence of root anatomical structures of young Pinus ponderosa seedlings grown in containers of contrasting volume (164 vs. 7000 cm3) was similar, seedlings reared 60 days in the large container had more vascular cambium although the xylem thickness was similar. In addition, seedlings in large containers had nearly twice as many resin ducts within the vascular cambium as their cohorts in small containers. Taproot length closely matched container depth. Though lateral root emission rates were similar between container sizes, large container seedlings had more than 2X the number of lateral roots as those from small containers. These differences in morphophysiological characteristics may be important to seedling establishment on sites that experience dry summer conditions, or for seedlings destined to drier, harsher sites. Further work to elucidate the ramifications of these morphophysiological differences on seedling establishment is warranted.

Keywords

References

Anderegg, W. R. L., Hicke, J. A., Fisher, R. A., Allen, C. D., Aukema, J., Bentz, B., Hood, S., Lichstein, J. W., Macalady, A. K., McDowell, N., Pan, Y., Raffa, K., Sala, A., Shaw, J. D., Stephenson, N. L., Tague, C., & Zeppel, M. (2015). Tree mortality from drought, insects, and their interactions in a changing climate. New Phytologist, 208(3), 674–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13477
Andivia, E., Villar‐Salvador, P., Oliet, J. A., Puértolas, J., Dumroese, R. K., Ivetić, V., Molina‐Venegas, R., Arellano, E. C., Li, G., & Ovalle, J. F. (2021). Climate and species stress resistance modulate the higher survival of large seedlings in forest restorations worldwide. Ecological Applications, 31(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2394
Aphalo, P., & Rikala, R. (2003). Field performance of silver-birch planting-stock grown at different spacing and in containers of different volume. New Forests, 25(2), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022618810937
Boucher, D., Lavallée, R., & Mauffette, Y. (2001). Biological performance of the white pine weevil in relation to the anatomy of the resin canal system of four different host species. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31(11), 2035–2041. https://doi.org/10.1139/x01-135
Bowden, R. (1993). Stock type selection in British Columbia. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Forest Nursery Association of British Columbia, 17–20.
Carlson, L. W., & Endean, F. (1976). The effect of rooting volume and container configuration on the early growth of white spruce seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 6(2), 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1139/x76-027
CARLSON, W. C., & LARSON, M. M. (1977). Changes in Auxin and Cytokinin Activity in Roots of Red Oak, Quercus rubra, Seedlings during Lateral Root Formation. Physiologia Plantarum, 41(2), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1977.tb05551.x
Chirino, E., Vilagrosa, A., Hernández, E. I., Matos, A., & Vallejo, V. R. (2008). Effects of a deep container on morpho-functional characteristics and root colonization in Quercus suber L. seedlings for reforestation in Mediterranean climate. Forest Ecology and Management, 256(4), 779–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.035
DALE, V. H., JOYCE, L. A., MCNULTY, S., NEILSON, R. P., AYRES, M. P., FLANNIGAN, M. D., HANSON, P. J., IRLAND, L. C., LUGO, A. E., PETERSON, C. J., SIMBERLOFF, D., SWANSON, F. J., STOCKS, B. J., & MICHAEL WOTTON, B. (2001). Climate Change and Forest Disturbances. BioScience, 51(9), 723. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0723:CCAFD]2.0.CO;2
Davis, S. D., Sperry, J. S., & Hacke, U. G. (1999). The relationship between xylem conduit diameter and cavitation caused by freezing. American Journal of Botany, 86(10), 1367–1372. https://doi.org/10.2307/2656919
Dumroese, R. K., Davis, A. S., & Jacobs, D. F. (2011). NURSERY RESPONSE OFACACIA KOASEEDLINGS TO CONTAINER SIZE, IRRIGATION METHOD, AND FERTILIZATION RATE. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 34(6), 877–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2011.544356
Dumroese, R. K., Landis, T. D., Pinto, J. R., Haase, D. L., Wilkinson, K. W., & Davis, A. S. (n.d.). Meeting Forest Restoration Challenges: Using the Target Plant Concept. REFORESTA, 1, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.1.03.3
Dumroese, R. K., Page-Dumroese, D. S., & Brown, R. E. (2011). Allometry, nitrogen status, and carbon stable isotope composition ofPinus ponderosaseedlings in two growing media with contrasting nursery irrigation regimes. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 41(5), 1091–1101. https://doi.org/10.1139/x11-017
Dumroese, R. K., Pinto, J. R., & Montville, M. E. (2015). Using container weights to determine irrigation needs: a simple method. Native Plants Journal, 16(1), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.3368/npj.16.1.67
Dumroese, R. K., Sung, S.-J. S., Pinto, J. R., Ross-Davis, A., & Scott, D. A. (2013). Morphology, gas exchange, and chlorophyll content of longleaf pine seedlings in response to rooting volume, copper root pruning, and nitrogen supply in a container nursery. New Forests, 44(6), 881–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-013-9377-5
Dumroese, R. K., Terzaghi, M., Chiatante, D., Scippa, G. S., Lasserre, B., & Montagnoli, A. (n.d.). Functional Traits of Pinus ponderosa Coarse Roots in Response to Slope Conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00947
Esteban, L. G., Martín, J. A., de Palacios, P., & Fernández, F. G. (2012). Influence of region of provenance and climate factors on wood anatomical traits of Pinus nigra Arn. subsp. salzmannii. European Journal of Forest Research, 131(3), 633–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0537-x
Grossnickle, S. C. (2005). Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New Forests, 30(2–3), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-004-8303-2
Grossnickle, S. C. (2012). Why seedlings survive: influence of plant attributes. New Forests, 43(5–6), 711–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9336-6
Grossnickle, S. C., & MacDonald, J. E. (n.d.). Seedling Quality: History, Application, and Plant Attributes. Forests, 9(5), 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9050283
Haase, D. L., & Davis, A. S. (n.d.). Developing and supporting quality nursery facilities and staff are necessary to meet global forest and landscape restoration needs. REFORESTA, 4, 69–93. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.4.06.45
Haywood, J. D., Sung, S.-J. S., & Sword Sayer, M. A. (2012). Copper Root Pruning and Container Cavity Size Influence Longleaf Pine Growth through Five Growing Seasons. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 36(3), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.5849/sjaf.10-051
Herms, D. A., & Mattson, W. J. (1992). The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or Defend. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 67(3), 283–335. https://doi.org/10.1086/417659
Hood, S., & Sala, A. (n.d.). Ponderosa pine resin defenses and growth: metrics matter. Tree Physiology, tpv098. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpv098
Jacobs, D. F., Salifu, K. F., & Seifert, J. R. (2005). Relative contribution of initial root and shoot morphology in predicting field performance of hardwood seedlings. New Forests, 30(2–3), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-005-5419-y
Kane, J. M., & Kolb, T. E. (2010). Importance of resin ducts in reducing ponderosa pine mortality from bark beetle attack. Oecologia, 164(3), 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1683-4
Kavanagh, K. L., & Zaerr, J. B. (1997). Xylem cavitation and loss of hydraulic conductance in western hemlock following planting. Tree Physiology, 17(1), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/17.1.59
Keyes, C. R., Maguire, D. A., & Tappeiner, J. C. (2007). Observed dynamics of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa var. ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws.) seedling recruitment in the Cascade Range, USA. New Forests, 34(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-007-9041-z
Kolb, P. F., & Robberecht, R. (1996a). High temperature and drought stress effects on survival of Pinus ponderosa seedlings. Tree Physiology, 16(8), 665–672. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/16.8.665
Kolb, P. F., & Robberecht, R. (1996b). Pinus ponderosa Seedling Establishment and the Influence of Competition with the Bunchgrass Agropyron spicatum. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 157(4), 509–515. https://doi.org/10.1086/297369
Kolb, T., Dixit, A., & Burney, O. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for maintaining ponderosa pine forests in the southwestern United States. Tree Planters’ Notes, 62(1 & 2), 104–112.
Korb, J. E., Fornwalt, P. J., & Stevens-Rumann, C. S. (2019). What drives ponderosa pine regeneration following wildfire in the western United States? Forest Ecology and Management, 454, 117663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117663
Kurz, W. A., Dymond, C. C., Stinson, G., Rampley, G. J., Neilson, E. T., Carroll, A. L., Ebata, T., & Safranyik, L. (2008). Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature, 452(7190), 987–990. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06777
Landis, T. D., Steinfeld, D. E., & Dumroese, R. K. (2010). Native plant containers for restoration projects. Native Plants Journal, 11(3), 341–348. https://doi.org/10.2979/NPJ.2010.11.3.341
Landis, T. D., Tinus, R. W., McDonald, S. E., & Barnett, J. P. (1990). Containers and growing media. In The container tree nursery manual. Agriculture Handbook 674. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service (Vol. 2, p. 88).
Larsen, H. S., South, D. B., & Boyer, J. M. (1986). Root growth potential, seedling morphology and bud dormancy correlate with survival of loblolly pine seedlings planted in December in Alabama. Tree Physiology, 1(3), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/1.3.253
Larson, M. M. (1963). Initial Root Development of Ponderosa Pine Seedlings as Related to Germination Date and Size of Seed. Forest Science, 9(4), 456–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/9.4.456
Lombardero, M. J., Ayres, M. P., Lorio Jr, P. L., & Ruel, J. J. (2000). Environmental effects on constitutive and inducible resin defences of Pinus taeda. Ecology Letters, 3(4), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00163.x
Mariotti, B., Maltoni, A., Jacobs, D. F., & Tani, A. (n.d.). Container effects on growth and biomass allocation inQuercus roburandJuglans regiaseedlings. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.1023352
Montagnoli, A., Dumroese, R. K., Terzaghi, M., Onelli, E., Scippa, G. S., & Chiatante, D. (2019). Seasonality of fine root dynamics and activity of root and shoot vascular cambium in a Quercus ilex L. forest (Italy). Forest Ecology and Management, 431, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.06.044
Montagnoli, A., Lasserre, B., Sferra, G., Chiatante, D., Scippa, G. S., Terzaghi, M., & Dumroese, R. K. (n.d.). Formation of Annual Ring Eccentricity in Coarse Roots within the Root Cage of Pinus ponderosa Growing on Slopes. Plants, 9(2), 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9020181
Moreira, X., Zas, R., Solla, A., & Sampedro, L. (2015). Differentiation of persistent anatomical defensive structures is costly and determined by nutrient availability and genetic growth-defence constraints. Tree Physiology, 35(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpu106
Nelson, W. R. (1989). Root pruning can influence first order lateral root development of containerised plants. Comb Proc Int Plant Prop Soc, 49, 96–103.
Oliet, J. A., & Jacobs, D. F. (2012). Restoring forests: advances in techniques and theory. New Forests, 43(5–6), 535–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9354-4
Oliet, J. A., Planelles, R., Artero, F., Valverde, R., Jacobs, D. F., & Segura, M. L. (2009). Field performance of Pinus halepensis planted in Mediterranean arid conditions: relative influence of seedling morphology and mineral nutrition. New Forests, 37(3), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-008-9126-3
Oliver, W. W., & Ryker, R. A. (1990). Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws. Ponderosa pine. Pinaceae – pine family. In Burns RM, Honkala BH (tech cords) Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654. US Department of Agriculture.
O’Neill, G. A., Aitken, S. N., King, J. N., & Alfaro, R. I. (2002). Geographic variation in resin canal defenses in seedlings from the Sitka spruce × white spruce introgression zone. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32(3), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1139/x01-206
Owen, S. M., Sieg, C. H., Fulé, P. Z., Gehring, C. A., Baggett, L. S., Iniguez, J. M., Fornwalt, P. J., & Battaglia, M. A. (2020). Persistent effects of fire severity on ponderosa pine regeneration niches and seedling growth. Forest Ecology and Management, 477, 118502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118502
Pemán, J., Voltas, J., & Gil-Pelegrin, E. (2006). Morphological and functional variability in the root system ofQuercus ilexL. subject to confinement: consequences for afforestation. Annals of Forest Science, 63(4), 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006022
Pinto, J. R., Marshall, J. D., Dumroese, R. K., Davis, A. S., & Cobos, D. R. (2011). Establishment and growth of container seedlings for reforestation: A function of stocktype and edaphic conditions. Forest Ecology and Management, 261(11), 1876–1884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.02.010
Pinto, J. R., Marshall, J. D., Dumroese, R. K., Davis, A. S., & Cobos, D. R. (2012). Photosynthetic response, carbon isotopic composition, survival, and growth of three stock types under water stress enhanced by vegetative competition. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 42(2), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1139/x11-189
Pinto, J. R., Marshall, J. D., Dumroese, R. K., Davis, A. S., & Cobos, D. R. (2016). Seedling establishment and physiological responses to temporal and spatial soil moisture changes. New Forests, 47(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-015-9511-7
Pittermann, J., & Sperry, J. (2003). Tracheid diameter is the key trait determining the extent of freezing-induced embolism in conifers. Tree Physiology, 23(13), 907–914. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/23.13.907
Pureswaran, D. S., Roques, A., & Battisti, A. (2018). Forest Insects and Climate Change. Current Forestry Reports, 4(2), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-018-0075-6
Rehfeldt, G. E., Jaquish, B. C., Sáenz-Romero, C., Joyce, D. G., Leites, L. P., Bradley St Clair, J., & López-Upton, J. (2014a). Comparative genetic responses to climate in the varieties of Pinus ponderosa and Pseudotsuga menziesii: Reforestation. Forest Ecology and Management, 324, 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.040
Rehfeldt, G. E., Jaquish, B. C., Sáenz-Romero, C., Joyce, D. G., Leites, L. P., Bradley St Clair, J., & López-Upton, J. (2014b). Comparative genetic responses to climate in the varieties of Pinus ponderosa and Pseudotsuga menziesii: Reforestation. Forest Ecology and Management, 324, 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.040
Ritchie, G. A., Landis, T. D., Dumroese, R. K., Haase, D. L., Landis, T. D., Dumroese, R. K., & Haase, D. L. (2010). Chapter 2: Assessing plant quality. In Agriculture Handbook 674. US Department of Agriculture (pp. 17–81).
Rodman, K. C., Veblen, T. T., Battaglia, M. A., Chambers, M. E., Fornwalt, P. J., Holden, Z. A., Kolb, T. E., Ouzts, J. R., & Rother, M. T. (2020). A changing climate is snuffing out post‐fire recovery in montane forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 29(11), 2039–2051. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13174
Rodríguez-García, A., López, R., Martín, J. A., Pinillos, F., & Gil, L. (2014). Resin yield in Pinus pinaster is related to tree dendrometry, stand density and tapping-induced systemic changes in xylem anatomy. Forest Ecology and Management, 313, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.10.038
Romero, A. E., Ryder, J., Fisher, J. T., & Mexal, J. G. (1986). Root system modification of container stock for arid land plantings. Forest Ecology and Management, 16(1–4), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(86)90028-9
Sampedro, L., Moreira, X., & Zas, R. (2011). Costs of constitutive and herbivore‐induced chemical defences in pine trees emerge only under low nutrient availability. Journal of Ecology, 99(3), 818–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01814.x
Seidl, R., Thom, D., Kautz, M., Martin-Benito, D., Peltoniemi, M., Vacchiano, G., Wild, J., Ascoli, D., Petr, M., Honkaniemi, J., Lexer, M. J., Trotsiuk, V., Mairota, P., Svoboda, M., Fabrika, M., Nagel, T. A., & Reyer, C. P. O. (2017). Forest disturbances under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 7(6), 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3303
South, D. B., Harris, S. W., Barnett, J. P., Hainds, M. J., & Gjerstad, D. H. (2005). Effect of container type and seedling size on survival and early height growth of Pinus palustris seedlings in Alabama, U.S.A. Forest Ecology and Management, 204(2–3), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.09.016
South, D. B., Shelton, J., & Enebak, S. A. (2001). Geotropic Lateral Roots of Container-grown Longleaf Pine Seedlings. Native Plants Journal, 2(2), 126–130. https://doi.org/10.3368/npj.2.2.126
Sturrock, R. N., Frankel, S. J., Brown, A. V., Hennon, P. E., Kliejunas, J. T., Lewis, K. J., Worrall, J. J., & Woods, A. J. (2011). Climate change and forest diseases. Plant Pathology, 60(1), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02406.x
Sun, Q., Dumroese, R. K., & Liu, Y. (2018). Container volume and subirrigation schedule influenceQuercus variabilisseedling growth and nutrient status in the nursery and field. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 33(6), 560–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2018.1444787
Sutton, R. F. (1980). Root system morphogenesis. New Zeal J Forest Sci, 10, 264–292.
Urza, A. K., Weisberg, P. J., & Dilts, T. (2020). Evidence of widespread topoclimatic limitation for lower treelines of the Intermountain West, United States. Ecological Applications, 30(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2158
Vázquez-González, C., López-Goldar, X., Zas, R., & Sampedro, L. (n.d.). Neutral and Climate-Driven Adaptive Processes Contribute to Explain Population Variation in Resin Duct Traits in a Mediterranean Pine Species. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01613
Vázquez-González, C., Zas, R., Erbilgin, N., Ferrenberg, S., Rozas, V., & Sampedro, L. (2020). Resin ducts as resistance traits in conifers: linking dendrochronology and resin-based defences. Tree Physiology, 40(10), 1313–1326. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpaa064
Villar-Salvador, P., Puértolas, J., Cuesta, B., Peñuelas, J. L., Uscola, M., Heredia-Guerrero, N., & Rey Benayas, J. M. (2012). Increase in size and nitrogen concentration enhances seedling survival in Mediterranean plantations. Insights from an ecophysiological conceptual model of plant survival. New Forests, 43(5–6), 755–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9328-6
Villar-Salvador, P., Puértolas, J., & Peñuelas, J. L. (2010). Assessing morphological and physiological plant quality for Mediterranean woodland restoration projects. In Land restoration to combat desertification: innovative approaches, quality control and project evaluation. Fundación Centro de Estudios Ambientales del Mediterráneo (CEAM (pp. 103–120).
Wakeley, P. C. (1935). Artificial reforestation in the southern pine region. Technical Bulletin, 492, 115.
Warren, J. M., Meinzer, F. C., Brooks, J. R., & Domec, J. C. (2005). Vertical stratification of soil water storage and release dynamics in Pacific Northwest coniferous forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 130(1–2), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.01.004
Wenny, D. L. (1995). Growing conservation seedlings by the square foot: making it pay. National Proceedings, Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-365. US Department of Agriculture, 56–59.
WERKER, E., & FAHN, A. (1969). Resin ducts of Pinus halepensis Mill.-Their structure, development and pattern of arrangement. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 62(4), 379–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1969.tb01974.x
Williams, H. M., South, D. B., & Webb, A. (1988). Effects of Fall Irrigation on Morphology and Root Growth Potential of Loblolly Pine Seedlings Growing in Sand. South African Forestry Journal, 147(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/00382167.1988.9628963
Williams, M. I., & Dumroese, R. K. (2013). Preparing for Climate Change: Forestry and Assisted Migration. Journal of Forestry, 111(4), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.13-016
Yang, M., Défossez, P., Danjon, F., Dupont, S., & Fourcaud, T. (2017). Which root architectural elements contribute the best to anchorage of Pinus species? Insights from in silico experiments. Plant and Soil, 411(1–2), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2992-0

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles