Tânia Fontana Dias, José Ricardo Macedo Pezzopane, Fábio Ribeiro Pires, Adriel Lima Nascimento, André Orlandi Nardotto Júnior
(2025)
Influence of container type and volume on the production of Calophyllum brasiliense and Cariniana estrellensis seedlings for recovery of degraded areas
Abstract In this study we investigated the dynamics of growth and quality features of 1+0 Austrian Pine (AP; Pinus nigra Arn.), Scots Pine (SP; Pinus sylvestris L.) and Maritime Pine (MP; Pinus pinaster Aiton) seedlings in containers Yukosad (YS; hard plastic, 75cm3, 610 seedlings m-2) and Siset (SS; gray cardboard with white coating, 128 cm3, 589 seedlings m-2). The experiment, for all Pine species, was conducted in randomized blocks in four replications. Each replication contained 10 multipots of each container type. After the seed germination, every 15 days, i.e. 10 times during the vegetation season, 10 seedlings of each of 4 replications, i.e. 40 seedlings of each container and Pine species, were analyzed. The following morphological characteristics were measured: shoot height (SH), root collar diameter (RCD), shoot dry weight (SDW), number, length and dry weight (RDW) of I, II and III order lateral roots (FOLR, SOLR and TOLR) and of the central root. Quality ratios and indexes were calculated. The dynamics of growth of selected features during the vegetation season was expressed as trend lines. AP and SP seedlings, grown in containers YS had higher values of almost all measured traits (SH, RCD, SDW, number, length and dry weight of FOLR, SOLR and TOLR). However, in AP, the SS seedlings had better values of quality indexes and ratios (SQ, DQI, SDW/RDW and RDW/SDW ratio), than YS seedlings. SP seedlings, except for SQ, had better quality indexes in YS container. MP seedlings, with some exceptions, have better above ground quality features in SS containers, while root systems don’t differ significantly in both containers. Root quality indicators (root intensity and root bound indexes) are more favorable in SS containers in all Pine species. The polynomial trend lines in AP and SP grow in similar way and intensity in both containers, gradually increasing during the vegetation season. MP seedlings differ in much more intensive growth of above ground features, especially in the half of the vegetative period in both containers, while during this period root quantity and length stagnates. Generally, the quality of AP and SP seedlings is more or less equal and satisfactory in both containers, while MP seedlings show slightly better results in SS container.
Arsovski, M., & Stankovski, B. (1980). Experiences in production of seedlings in containers Yukosad and Makosad and results of afforestation bare lands with the seedlings. In Serbian: Искуства из производње садница у контејнерима Јукосад и Макосад и резултати од пошумљавања голина тим садницама). Forestry (Vol. 3, pp. 47–56).
Baker, G. (1988). Seasonal growth characteristics of red beech, Corsican pine, ponderosa pine, radiata pine, and Douglas fir nursery seedlings. New Zeland Journal of Forestry, 32(4), 22–24.
Barnett, J. P., & Brissette, J. C. (1986). Producing southern pine seedlings in containers. https://doi.org/10.2737/SO-GTR-59
Boyer, W. D. (1970). Shoot Growth Patterns of Young Loblolly Pine. Forest Science, 16(4), 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/16.4.472
Burdett, A. N. (1990). Physiological processes in plantation establishment and the development of specifications for forest planting stock. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 20(4), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1139/x90-059
Chiatante, D., Di Iorio, A., Sarnataro, M., & Scippa, G. S. (2002). Improving vigour assessment of pine (Pinus nigraArnold) seedlings before their use in reforestation. Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with All Aspects of Plant Biology, 136(2), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263500212331351109
Davis, A. S., & Jacobs, D. F. (2005). Quantifying root system quality of nursery seedlings and relationship to outplanting performance. New Forests, 30(2–3), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-005-7480-y
Devetaković, J. R., Makimović, Z., Ivanović, B., Baković, Z., & Ivetić, V. (n.d.). Stocktype effect on field performance of Austrian pine seedlings. REFORESTA, 4, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.4.03.42
Dickson, A., Leaf, A. L., & Hosner, J. F. (1960). QUALITY APPRAISAL OF WHITE SPRUCE AND WHITE PINE SEEDLING STOCK IN NURSERIES. The Forestry Chronicle, 36(1), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc36010-1
Duryea, M. (1985). Evaluating seedling quality. In In.
Endean, F., & Carlson, L. W. (1975). The Effect of Rooting Volume on the Early Growth of Lodgepole Pine Seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 5(1), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1139/x75-007
Girouard, R. M. (1995). ROOT FORM AND STABILITY OF OUTPLANTED TREES: RESULTS OF A 1989 SURVEY. Arboricultural Journal, 19(2), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.1995.9747054
Grossnickle, S. C. (2005a). Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New Forests, 30(2–3), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-004-8303-2
Grossnickle, S. C. (2005b). Seedling size and reforestation success. How big is big enough? The Thin Green Line: A Symposium on the State-of-the-Art in Reforestation. Forest Research Information Paper 160, Ontario Forest Research Institute, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Sault Ste, 138–144.
Grossnickle, S. C. (2012). Why seedlings survive: influence of plant attributes. New Forests, 43(5–6), 711–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9336-6
Grossnickle, S. C., & El-Kassaby, Y. A. (2016). Bareroot versus container stocktypes: a performance comparison. New Forests, 47(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-015-9476-6
Grossnickle, S. C., & MacDonald, J. E. (n.d.). Seedling Quality: History, Application, and Plant Attributes. Forests, 9(5), 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9050283
Haase, D. L. (2008). Understanding forest seedling quality: measurements and interpretation. Tree Planters’ Notes, 52(2), 24–30.
Hiatt, A. H., & Tinus, R. W. (1974). Container shape controls root system configuration of Ponderosa Pine. Symposium: North American Containerized Forest Tree Seedling, 194–196.
Ivetić, V., Grossnickle, S., & Škorić, M. (n.d.). Forecasting the field performance of Austrian pine seedlings using morphological attributes. IForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 10(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1722-009
Ivetić, V., & Škorić, M. (2013). The impact of seeds provenance and nursery production method on Austrian pine (Pinus nigra Arnold) seedlings quality. Ann Forest Res, 56(2), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2013.29.
Jacobs, D. F., & Seifert. (2004). Re-evaluating the significance of the first-order lateral root grading criterion for hardwood seedlings. Proceedings of “14th Central Hardwood Forest Conference”. General Technical Report NE-316, USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experimental Station, St, 382–388.
Jelić, G. (2012). Effects of container type and field preparation on afforestation success in Mediterranean area (p. 220).
Jinks, R., & Mason, B. (1998a). Effects of seedling density on the growth of Corsican pine (Pinus nigra var. maritima Melv.), Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii Franco) in containers. Annales Des Sciences Forestières, 55(4), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19980402
Jinks, R., & Mason, B. (1998b). Effects of seedling density on the growth of Corsican pine (Pinus nigra var. maritima Melv.), Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii Franco) in containers. Annales Des Sciences Forestières, 55(4), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19980402
Kitić, D., Petrović, S., Marović, R., & Topalović, M. (1985). Kulture crnog I belog bora (Pinus nigra Arn. i Pinus sylvestris L.) osnovane sadnicama sa zaštićenim korenom na području šuma Šumskog gazdinstva Pirot. In Savetovanje: Razvoj šumskih kultura u SR. Srbiji osnovanih sadnicama proizvedenim u kontejnerima od tvrde plastike.
Kolevska, D. (1995). Influence of seedling type and soil conditions on development of root systems of Austrian Pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) in Macedonia (p. 307).
Kolevska, D. (1997). Influence of seedling type on root development of the Black pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) seedlings in Macedonia. Book of Abstracts: The 3rd International Conference on the Development of Forestry and Wood Science / Technology, I.
Kolevska, D. D. (2012). Root deformations of Austrian Black Pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) seedlings and trees in stands raised by various stock type seedlings. Forestry Ideas, 18(2), 177–188.
Kolevska, D. D., & Trajkov, P. (2012). Quality and development of containerized seedlings and stands of Austrian Black Pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) in the Republic of Macedonia (FYROM. Forestry Ideas, 18(1), 19–27.
Kolevska, D. D., Trajkov, P., Maletic, V., & Terziska, M. (2015). Dynamic of growth and quality of Arizona Cypress (Cupressus arizonica Greene) seedlings from three container types. Proceedings: International Conference Reforestation Challenges, 03-.
Kolevska, D. D., Trajkov, P., Maletic, V., & Velickovska, S. (2018). Results of application of Superabsorbent ZebaTM on field survival of containerized Austrian Pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) seedlings in Macedonia. Book of Abstracts: International Conference Reforestation Challenges, 34.
Kolevska, D. D., Trajkov, P., Terziska, M., & Grazdani, N. (2006). Quality and growing features of Austrian Pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) seedlings of various production technologies. International Conference: Sustainable Use of Forest Ecosystems. Book of Abstracts, 17–23.
Landis, T. D. (1985). Mineral nutrition as an index of seedling quality. In Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures, and Predictive Abilities of Major Tests (pp. 29–48).
Landis, T. D. (1990). Containers: types and functions. The Container Tree Nursery Manual, ic(andbk. 674), 1–39.
Landis, T. D., Dumroese, R. K., & Haase, D. L. (2010). The container tree nursery manual. Agriculture Handbook, 7.
Lokvenc, T. (1980). Typizace deformací kořenů v kulturách založených sadebním materiálem s obalenými kořeny. Lesnictví, 26, 109–118.
Lucic, A., Isajev, V., Rakonjac, L., Mataruga, M., Popovic, V., Nevenic, R., & Mladenovic-Drinic, S. (2012). Analysis of inter - population variability Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) using morphometric markers. Genetika, 44(3), 689–699. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1203689L
LYR, H., & HOFFMANN, G. (1967). Growth Rates and Growth Periodicity of Tree Roots. In International Review of Forestry Research (pp. 181–236). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4831-9976-4.50011-X
Mauer, O., & Palatova, E. (2004). Root system deformations and stability of forest stands (In Czech: Deformace kořenového systému a stabilita lesních porostů.) In: Možnosti použití sadebního materiálu z intenzivních školkařských technologií pro obnovu lesa. Sborník přednášek z mezinárodního semináře. Opočno, 3, 4 6.
Načeski, S., Almaši, S., Stošić, R., Kirov, N., Papazova, M., & Papazova-Anakieva, I. (2012). The effect of superabsorbent Zeba and easy reachable zinc (Zn) on forest plant establishment in Stip region. In Macedonian: Влијание на суперабсорбентот Зеба и лесно пристапниот цинк (Zn) во пошумувањето во Штипскиот регион). Plant Protection (pp. 121–128).
North Macedonia, S. Y. (2019). (pp. 485–487).
Oliet, J. A., Planelles, R., Artero, F., Valverde, R., Jacobs, D. F., & Segura, M. L. (2009). Field performance of Pinus halepensis planted in Mediterranean arid conditions: relative influence of seedling morphology and mineral nutrition. New Forests, 37(3), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-008-9126-3
Popovski, P. (1985). Deformation of root system of seedlings produced in containers Kopparfors and Yucosad in Macedonia Conference: Development of Forest Stands in SR Serbia raised by Seedlings produced in Hard Plastic Containers. In Macedonian). Book of Papers. Institute for forestry and wood science (pp. 1–7).
Popovski, P. (1986). The results in “Paperpot” seedlings production of Austriaca Pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) and afforestation with them in SR Macedonia (Yugoslavia) (In Macedonian. Forestry Review, 7–12, 15–28.
Popovski, P., & Levkova, P. (1977). Results of four years of production and afforestation of Paperpot seedlings in SR Macedonia in 1974-1977. Macedonian). Symposium of Application of Paperpot System in Forest Seedlings Production and Modern Systems of Afforestation, Skopje, 29.
Proceedings: Evaluating seedling quality: principles, procedures, and predictive abilities of major tests. Workshop held October 16-18, 1984. (n.d.).
Roller, K. J. (1977). Suggested minimum standards for containerised seedlings in Nova Scotia. Department of Fisheries and Environment Canada, Canadian Forestry Service, Information Report, M-X–69, 1–18.
Šmit, S., Kitić, D., Marković, D., & Mancić, A. (1985). Analiza razvoja kultura osnovanih na serpentinskoj geološkoj podlozi sadnicama sa zašticenim korenovim sistemom. Proceedings, Savetovanje - Razvoj Šumskih Kultura u SR. Srbiji Osnovanih Sadnicama Proizvedenim u Kontejnerima Od Tvrde Plastike.
South, D. B., & Mitchell, R. G. (2005). A root-bound index for container-grown pines. Proceedings, Symposium on the State-of-the-Art in Reforestation; The Thin Green Line, 88–93.
Stilinović, S., Ðorðević, D., Markovski, K., & Grbić, M. (1980). Prilog poznavanju oblika i strukture korena šumskih sadnica odgajenih različitim sistemima rasadnicke proizvodnje.
Stjepanovic, S., & Ivetic, V. (2013). Morphological indicators of the quality of one-year-old bare-root seedlings of wild cherry (Prunus avium L.). Glasnik Sumarskog Fakulteta, 107, 205–215. https://doi.org/10.2298/GSF1307201S
Thompson, B. E. (1985). Seedling morphological evaluation - what you can tell by looking. Proceedings, Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures, and Predictive Abilities of Major Tests Workshop; October 16-18, 59–71.
Tinus, R. W., & McDonald, S. E. (1979). How to grow seedlings in containers in greenhouses. USDA. Gen. Tech. Rep, RM-60, 256.
Topić, V., Đurđević, Z., Butorac, L., & Jelić, G. (2006). Influence of container type on growth and development of stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) seedlings in nursery (In Croatian: Utjecaj tipa kontejnera na rast i razvoj sadnica pinije (Pinus pinea L.) u rasadniku. Radovi, 9, 149–158.
Tsakaldimi, M., Ganatsas, P., & Jacobs, D. F. (2013). Prediction of planted seedling survival of five Mediterranean species based on initial seedling morphology. New Forests, 44(3), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9339-3
Tsakaldimi, M., Zagas, T., Tsitsoni, T., & Ganatsas, P. (2005). Root Morphology, Stem Growth and Field Performance of Seedlings of Two Mediterranean Evergreen Oak Species Raised in Different Container Types. Plant and Soil, 278(1–2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-2580-1
Tsitsoni, T., Tsakaldimi, M., & Gousiopoulou, M. (2015). Studying Shoot and Root Architecture and Growth of Quercus ithaburensis subsp. macrolepis Seedlings; a Key Factor for Successful Restoration of Mediterranean Ecosystems. Ecologia Mediterranea, 41(2), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.3406/ecmed.2015.1240
Wang, J., Li, G., Pinto, J., Liu, J., Shi, W., & Liu, Y. (n.d.). Both nursery and field performance determine suitable nitrogen supply of nursery-grown, exponentially fertilized Chinese pine. Silva Fennica, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1295
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
