Perceptions of commercial plants and tree nurseries in the use of native forest tree species for urban landscaping activities in municipalities of Los Baños and Bay, Philippines
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1384(1)
Plantations offer a high potential to respond to the increasing pressure on forests to deliver social, economic, and environmental services. Exotic tree species have a long history of use in plantation forestry, mostly because of their improved productivity compared with that of native species. Because of their impacts on land management and the environment, questions arise regarding the compatibility of exotic tree plantations with sustainable forest management (SFM), the overarching paradigm driving forest legislations in Canada. Our objectives were thus to i) briefly review the historical and current use of exotic tree species in Canada, ii) identify the social, economic and environmental issues related to the use of exotic tree species in Canadian forestry, based on sustainable forest management criteria, and iii) identify perspectives related to the use of exotic tree species in the sustainable management of Canadian forests. Results show that six out of ten Canadian provinces do not have specific legislations to control the use of exotic tree species for reforestation within their borders. The use of exotic tree species is mainly controlled through third-party certification agencies. Exotic tree species represent a small proportion of the planted seedlings in Canada and Norway spruce is the most common one. The use of exotic tree species is compatible with sustainable forest management criteria used in Canada, but forest managers must take into account several issues related to their use and maintain a social license to be entitled to plant them. Issues are highly dependent upon scale. The zoning of management intensity could provide environmental, economic and social benefits, but costs/benefits analyses should be carried out. The concept of naturalness could also be useful to integrate plantations of exotic species in jurisdiction where SFM strategies are based on ecosystem management principles. Monitoring of hybridization and invasiveness of exotic species must be included in landscape analyses to forestall loss of resilience leading to compromised structural and functional ecosystem states. The use of exotics species is recognized as a tool to sequester carbon and facilitate adaptation of forests to global changes, but it is necessary to carefully identified contexts where assisted migration is justified and disentangle planned novel ecosystems coherent with global changes generated by assisted migration from those emerging from invasive species forming undesired states.
Adams, J. M., Fang, W., Callaway, R. M., Cipollini, D., & Newell, E. (2009). A cross-continental test of the Enemy Release Hypothesis: leaf herbivory on Acer platanoides (L.) is three times lower in North America than in its native Europe. Biological Invasions, 11(4), 1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9312-4
Alberta Forestry Division of Environment Sustainable Resource Development. (2009).
Anderson, J. A., Armstrong, G. W., Luckert, M. K., & Adamowicz, W. L. (2013). Optimal zoning of forested land considering the contribution of exotic plantations. Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences, 4, 92–104.
Anderson, J. A., Luckert, M. K. (Marty), & Campbell, H. N. (2015). Potential policy reforms for a “more exotic” Canadian forest sector: Comparing Canada’s plantation policies with those in Australia, New Zealand and the United States. The Forestry Chronicle, 91(05), 560–572. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2015-095
Arbez, M. (2001). Ecological impacts of plantation forests on biodiversity and genetic diversity (pp. 7–20).
Arseneau, C., & Chiu, M. (2003). Canada – A land of plantations? UNFF Intersessional Experts Meeting. Maximising the Role of Planted Forests in Sustainable Forest Management. New Zealand.
Aubin, I., Garbe, C. M., Colombo, S., Drever, C. R., McKenney, D. W., Messier, C., Pedlar, J., Saner, M. A., Venier, L., Wellstead, A. M., Winder, R., Witten, E., & Ste-Marie, C. (2011). Why we disagree about assisted migration: Ethical implications of a key debate regarding the future of Canada’s forests. The Forestry Chronicle, 87(06), 755–765. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2011-092
Barrette, M., Leblanc, M., Thiffault, N., Paquette, A., Lavoie, L., Bélanger, L., Bujold, F., Côté, L., Lamoureux, J., Schneider, R., Tremblay, J.-P., Côté, S., Boucher, Y., & Deshaies, M.-È. (2014). Issues and solutions for intensive plantation silviculture in a context of ecosystem management. The Forestry Chronicle, 90(06), 748–762. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2014-147
Barua, S. K., Lehtonen, P., & Pahkasalo, T. (2014). Plantation vision: potentials, challenges and policy options for global industrial forest plantation development. International Forestry Review, 16(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554814811724801
Beaudoin, A., Bernier, P. Y., Guindon, L., Villemaire, P., Guo, X. J., Stinson, G., Bergeron, T., Magnussen, S., & Hall, R. J. (2014). Mapping attributes of Canada’s forests at moderate resolution through kNN and MODIS imagery. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 44(5), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2013-0401
Bell, F. W., Parton, J., Stocker, N., Joyce, D., Reid, D., Wester, M., Stinson, A., Kayahara, G., & Towill, B. (2008). Developing a silvicultural framework and definitions for use in forest management planning and practice. The Forestry Chronicle, 84(5), 678–693. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc84678-5
Bergeron, Y., Cyr, D., Girardin, M. P., & Carcaillet, C. (2010). Will climate change drive 21st century burn rates in Canadian boreal forest outside of its natural variability: collating global climate model experiments with sedimentary charcoal data. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 19(8), 1127. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF09092
Bilodeau-Gauthier, S., Paré, D., Messier, C., & Bélanger, N. (2011). Juvenile growth of hybrid poplars on acidic boreal soil determined by environmental effects of soil preparation, vegetation control, and fertilization. Forest Ecology and Management, 261(3), 620–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.11.016
Brandt, J. P., Flannigan, M. D., Maynard, D. G., Thompson, I. D., & Volney, W. J. A. (2013). An introduction to Canada’s boreal zone: ecosystem processes, health, sustainability, and environmental issues. Environmental Reviews, 21(4), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2013-0040
Brockerhoff, E. G., Jactel, H., Parrotta, J. A., Quine, C. P., & Sayer, J. (2008). Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodiversity and Conservation, 17(5), 925–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9380-x
Carle, J. B., & Holmgren, L. P. B. (2009). Wood from planted forests: global outlook to 2030. In Planted forests: uses, impacts and sustainability (pp. 47–59). https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845935641.0047
Carnus, J.-M., Parrotta, J., Brockerhoff, E., Arbez, M., Jactel, H., Kremer, A., Lamb, D., O’Hara, K., & Walters, B. (2006). Planted Forests and Biodiversity. Journal of Forestry, 104(2), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/104.2.65
Castonguay, S. (n.d.). Foresterie scientifique et reforestation : l’État et la production d’une « forêt à pâte » au Québec dans la première moitié du xxe siècle1. Revue d’histoire de l’Amérique Française, 60(1–2), 61–93. https://doi.org/10.7202/014595ar
Dare, M. (Lain), Schirmer, J., & Vanclay, F. (2011). Does forest certification enhance community engagement in Australian plantation management? Forest Policy and Economics, 13(5), 328–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.03.011
Dennison, W. C. (2008). Environmental problem solving in coastal ecosystems: A paradigm shift to sustainability. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 77(2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2007.09.031
DesRochers, A., van den Driessche, R., & Thomas, B. R. (2006). NPK fertilization at planting of three hybrid poplar clones in the boreal region of Alberta. Forest Ecology and Management, 232(1–3), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.06.004
Dodet, M., & Collet, C. (2012). When should exotic forest plantation tree species be considered as an invasive threat and how should we treat them? Biological Invasions, 14(9), 1765–1778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0202-4
Dupras, J., Parcerisas, L., & Brenner, J. (2016). Using ecosystem services valuation to measure the economic impacts of land-use changes on the Spanish Mediterranean coast (El Maresme, 1850–2010). Regional Environmental Change, 16(4), 1075–1088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0847-5
Elfving, B., Ericsson, T., & Rosvall, O. (2001). The introduction of lodgepole pine for wood production in Sweden — a review. Forest Ecology and Management, 141(1–2), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00485-0
Elmendorf, S. C., Henry, G. H. R., Hollister, R. D., Björk, R. G., Boulanger-Lapointe, N., Cooper, E. J., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Day, T. A., Dorrepaal, E., Elumeeva, T. G., Gill, M., Gould, W. A., Harte, J., Hik, D. S., Hofgaard, A., Johnson, D. R., Johnstone, J. F., Jónsdóttir, I. S., Jorgenson, J. C., … Wipf, S. (2012). Plot-scale evidence of tundra vegetation change and links to recent summer warming. Nature Climate Change, 2(6), 453–457. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1465
Fang, Z., Bao, W., Yan, X., & Liu, X. (n.d.). Understory Structure and Vascular Plant Diversity in Naturally Regenerated Deciduous Forests and Spruce Plantations on Similar Clear-Cuts: Implications for Forest Regeneration Strategy Selection. Forests, 5(4), 715–743. https://doi.org/10.3390/f5040715
F.A.O. (2010a). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010: Main report. FAO Forestry Papers.
FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. (2015).
Felton, A., Boberg, J., Björkman, C., & Widenfalk, O. (2013). Identifying and managing the ecological risks of using introduced tree species in Sweden’s production forestry. Forest Ecology and Management, 307, 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.059
Ford, R. M., Williams, K. J. H., Bishop, I. D., & Hickey, J. E. (2009). Public judgements of the social acceptability of silvicultural alternatives in Tasmanian wet eucalypt forests. Australian Forestry, 72(4), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2009.10676298
Fortier, J., Truax, B., Gagnon, D., & Lambert, F. (2012). Hybrid poplar yields in Québec: Implications for a sustainable forest zoning management system. The Forestry Chronicle, 88(04), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2012-075
Gauthier, S., Bernier, P., Kuuluvainen, T., Shvidenko, A. Z., & Schepaschenko, D. G. (2015). Boreal forest health and global change. Science, 349(6250), 819–822. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa9092
Groupe d’experts sur la sylviculture intensive de plantations. (2013).
Guillemette, T., & DesRochers, A. (2008). Early growth and nutrition of hybrid poplars fertilized at planting in the boreal forest of western Quebec. Forest Ecology and Management, 255(7), 2981–2989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.02.004
Hansen, A. J., McComb, W. C., Vega, R., Raphael, M. G., & Hunter, M. (1995). Bird Habitat Relationships in Natural and Managed Forests in the West Cascades of Oregon. Ecological Applications, 5(3), 555–569. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941966
Hartley, M. J. (2002). Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 155(1–3), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00549-7
Hartmann, H., Daoust, G., & Bigué, B. (2010). Negative or positive effects of plantation and intensive forestry on biodiversity: A matter of scale and perspective. The Forestry Chronicle, 86(3), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc86354-3
Hébert, F., Bachand, M., Thiffault, N., Paré, D., & Gagné, P. (2016). Recovery of plant community functional traits following severe soil perturbation in plantations: a case-study. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 12(1–2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2016.1146334
Hobbs, R. J., Arico, S., Aronson, J., Baron, J. S., Bridgewater, P., Cramer, V. A., Epstein, P. R., Ewel, J. J., Klink, C. A., Lugo, A. E., Norton, D., Ojima, D., Richardson, D. M., Sanderson, E. W., Valladares, F., Vilà, M., Zamora, R., & Zobel, M. (2006). Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00212.x
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Schmid, B., Setälä, H., Symstad, A. J., Vandermeer, J., & Wardle, D. A. (2005). EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE. Ecological Monographs, 75(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0922
Howe, G. T., Shindler, B., Cashore, B., Hansen, E., Lach, D., & Armstrong, W. (2005). Public Influences on Plantation Forestry. Journal of Forestry, 103(2), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/103.2.90
HUNTER, M. L., JACOBSON, G. L., & WEBB, T. (1988). Paleoecology and the Coarse‐Filter Approach to Maintaining Biological Diversity. Conservation Biology, 2(4), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1988.tb00202.x
Jactel, H., & Brockerhoff, E. G. (2007). Tree diversity reduces herbivory by forest insects. Ecology Letters, 10(9), 835–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01073.x
Kjær, E. D., Lobo, A., & Myking, T. (2014). The role of exotic tree species in Nordic forestry. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 29(4), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.926098
Kreyling, J., Bittner, T., Jaeschke, A., Jentsch, A., Jonas Steinbauer, M., Thiel, D., & Beierkuhnlein, C. (2011). Assisted Colonization: A Question of Focal Units and Recipient Localities. Restoration Ecology, 19(4), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00777.x
Kullman, L. (1998). Palaeoecological, Biogeographical and Palaeoclimatological Implications of Early Holocene Immigration of Larix sibirica Ledeb. into the Scandes Mountains, Sweden. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 7(3), 181. https://doi.org/10.2307/2997373
Langor, D. W., Cameron, E. K., MacQuarrie, C. J. K., McBeath, A., McClay, A., Peter, B., Pybus, M., Ramsfield, T., Ryall, K., Scarr, T., Yemshanov, D., DeMerchant, I., Foottit, R., & Pohl, G. R. (2014). Non-native species in Canada’s boreal zone: diversity, impacts, and risk. Environmental Reviews, 22(4), 372–420. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2013-0083
Larchevêque, M., Larocque, G. R., Tremblay, F., Gaussiran, S., Boutin, R., Brais, S., Beaulieu, J., Daoust, G., & Périnet, P. (2010). Juvenile productivity of five hybrid poplar clones and 20 genetically improved white and Norway spruces in boreal clay-belt of Quebec, Canada. The Forestry Chronicle, 86(2), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc86225-2
Larocque, G. R., DesRochers, A., Larchevêque, M., Tremblay, F., Beaulieu, J., Mosseler, A., Major, J. E., Gaussiran, S., Thomas, B. R., Sidders, D., Périnet, P., Kort, J., Labrecque, M., Savoie, P., Masse, S., Bouman, O. T., Kamelchuk, D., Benomar, L., Mamashita, T., & Gagné, P. (2013). Research on hybrid poplars and willow species for fast-growing tree plantations: Its importance for growth and yield, silviculture, policy-making and commercial applications. The Forestry Chronicle, 89(01), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2013-009
Lindenmayer, D. B., Hobbs, R. J., Likens, G. E., Krebs, C. J., & Banks, S. C. (2011). Newly discovered landscape traps produce regime shifts in wet forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(38), 15887–15891. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1110245108
Lteif, A., Whalen, J. K., Bradley, R. L., & Camiré, C. (2007). Mixtures of papermill biosolids and pig slurry improve soil quality and growth of hybrid poplar. Soil Use and Management, 23(4), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00103.x
MacDougall, A. S., McCann, K. S., Gellner, G., & Turkington, R. (2013). Diversity loss with persistent human disturbance increases vulnerability to ecosystem collapse. Nature, 494(7435), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11869
Managing Forests as Complex Adaptive Systems. (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203122808
Mårald, E., Sandström, C., Rist, L., Rosvall, O., Samuelsson, L., & Idenfors, A. (2015). Exploring the use of a dialogue process to tackle a complex and controversial issue in forest management. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 30(8), 749–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.1065343
Maron, J. L., & Vilà, M. (2001). When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos, 95(3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.950301.x
McLACHLAN, J. S., HELLMANN, J. J., & SCHWARTZ, M. W. (2007). A Framework for Debate of Assisted Migration in an Era of Climate Change. Conservation Biology, 21(2), 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00676.x
Meirmans, P. G., Gros-Louis, M.-C., Lamothe, M., Perron, M., Bousquet, J., & Isabel, N. (2014). Rates of spontaneous hybridization and hybrid recruitment in co-existing exotic and native mature larch populations. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 10(4), 965–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-014-0735-z
Messier, C., Tittler, R., Kneeshaw, D. D., Gélinas, N., Paquette, A., Berninger, K., Rheault, H., Meek, P., & Beaulieu, N. (2009). TRIAD zoning in Quebec: Experiences and results after 5 years. The Forestry Chronicle, 85(6), 885–896. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc85885-6
Miller, J. E., & Miller, D. A. (2016). Introduction: Ecological, biological, economic, and social issues associated with captive cervids. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 40(1), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.639
Moffat, K., Lacey, J., Zhang, A., & Leipold, S. (2016). The social licence to operate: a critical review. Forestry, 89(5), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpv044
Morandini, R. (1964). Genetics and improvement of exotic trees. Unasylva.18, 51–60.
Morris, T. L., Esler, K. J., Barger, N. N., Jacobs, S. M., & Cramer, M. D. (2011). Ecophysiological traits associated with the competitive ability of invasive Australian acacias. Diversity and Distributions, 17(5), 898–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00802.x
Mulloy, G. A. (1935). EXOTIC TREES IN CANADA. The Forestry Chronicle, 11(3), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc11033-3
Myking, T., Yakovlev, I., & Ersland, G. A. (2011). Nuclear genetic markers indicate Danish origin of the Norwegian beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) populations established in 500–1,000 AD. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 7(3), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-010-0358-y
Nations, U. (1992). Report of the United Nations conference on environment and development.
Nelson, A. S., Saunders, M. R., Wagner, R. G., & Weiskittel, A. R. (2012). Early stand production of hybrid poplar and white spruce in mixed and monospecific plantations in eastern Maine. New Forests, 43(4), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-011-9296-2
O’Hehir, J. F., & Nambiar, E. K. S. (2010). Productivity of three successive rotations of P. radiata plantations in South Australia over a century. Forest Ecology and Management, 259(10), 1857–1869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.12.004
Pâquet, J., C, G. F., P, R., & JP, S. (2013). Les aspects visuels des traitements sylvicoles. In Larouche.
Paquette, A., & Messier, C. (2010). The role of plantations in managing the world’s forests in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1890/080116
Paritsis, J., & Aizen, M. A. (2008). Effects of exotic conifer plantations on the biodiversity of understory plants, epigeal beetles and birds in Nothofagus dombeyi forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 255(5–6), 1575–1583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.11.015
Park, A., & Wilson, E. R. (2007). Beautiful Plantations: can intensive silviculture help Canada to fulfill ecological and timber production objectives? The Forestry Chronicle, 83(6), 825–839. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc83825-6
Pedlar, J., McKenney, D., Beaulieu, J., Colombo, S., McLachlan, J., & O’Neill, G. (2011). The implementation of assisted migrationin Canadian forests. The Forestry Chronicle, 87(06), 766–777. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2011-093
Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R., & Morrison, D. (2005). Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics, 52(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002
Price, D. T., Alfaro, R. I., Brown, K. J., Flannigan, M. D., Fleming, R. A., Hogg, E. H., Girardin, M. P., Lakusta, T., Johnston, M., McKenney, D. W., Pedlar, J. H., Stratton, T., Sturrock, R. N., Thompson, I. D., Trofymow, J. A., & Venier, L. A. (2013). Anticipating the consequences of climate change for Canada’s boreal forest ecosystems. Environmental Reviews, 21(4), 322–365. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2013-0042
Richardson, D. M. (1998). Forestry Trees as Invasive Aliens. Conservation Biology, 12(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.96392.x
Richardson, D. M., Pyšek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M. G., Panetta, F. D., & West, C. J. (2000). Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions, 6(2), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x
Roberge, J.-M., & Stenbacka, F. (2014). Assemblages of epigaeic beetles and understory vegetation differ between stands of an introduced pine and its native congener in boreal forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 318, 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.026
Rompré, G., Boucher, Y., Bélanger, L., Côté, S., & Robinson, W. D. (2010). Conserving biodiversity in managed forest landscapes: The use of critical thresholds for habitat. The Forestry Chronicle, 86(5), 589–596. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc86589-5
Rytter, L., & Stener, L.-G. (2005). Productivity and thinning effects in hybrid aspen (Populus tremula L. × P. tremuloides Michx.) stands in southern Sweden. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 78(3), 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpi026
Sansilvestri, R., Frascaria‐Lacoste, N., & Fernández‐Manjarrés, J. (2016). One option, two countries, several strategies: subjacent mechanisms of assisted migration implementation in Canada and France. Restoration Ecology, 24(4), 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12343
Sax, D. F. (2002). Equal diversity in disparate species assemblages: a comparison of native and exotic woodlands in California. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001.00262.x
Schierenbeck, K. A., & Ellstrand, N. C. (2009). Hybridization and the evolution of invasiveness in plants and other organisms. Biological Invasions, 11(5), 1093–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9388-x
Sedjo, R. A. (1999). The potential of high-yield plantation forestry for meeting timber needs. In Forestry Sciences (pp. 339–359). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2689-4_21
SFI (Sustainable Forestry Initiative. (2015).
Swaffer, B. A., & Holland, K. L. (2015). Comparing ecophysiological traits and evapotranspiration of an invasive exotic, Pinus halepensis in native woodland overlying a karst aquifer. Ecohydrology, 8(2), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1502
Thompson, I. D., Baker, J. A., & Ter-Mikaelian, M. (2003). A review of the long-term effects of post-harvest silviculture on vertebrate wildlife, and predictive models, with an emphasis on boreal forests in Ontario, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management, 177(1–3), 441–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00453-X
Tittler, R., Messier, C., & Fall, A. (2012). Concentrating anthropogenic disturbance to balance ecological and economic values: applications to forest management. Ecological Applications, 22(4), 1268–1277. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1680.1
Tullus, A., Rytter, L., Tullus, T., Weih, M., & Tullus, H. (2012). Short-rotation forestry with hybrid aspen (Populus tremulaL.×P. tremuloidesMichx.) in Northern Europe. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 27(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2011.628949
Waldron, R. M. (1973). Direct seeding in Canada 1900-1972. Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forest Research Centre.
Weetman, G. F. (1982). The Evolution and Status of Canadian Silviculture Practice. The Forestry Chronicle, 58(2), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc58074-2
White, T., Davis, J., Gezan, S., Hulcr, J., Jokela, E., Kirst, M., Martin, T. A., Peter, G., Powell, G., & Smith, J. (2014). Breeding for value in a changing world: past achievements and future prospects. New Forests, 45(3), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-013-9400-x
Wilshusen, P. R., & Wallace, R. L. (2009). Integrative problem solving: the policy sciences as a framework for conservation policy and planning. Policy Sciences, 42(2), 91–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9092-4
Winter, S., Fischer, H. S., & Fischer, A. (2010). Relative Quantitative Reference Approach for Naturalness Assessments of forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 259(8), 1624–1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.040
Woodley, S. J., Johnson, G., Freedman, B., & Kirk, D. A. (n.d.). Effects of Timber Harvesting and Plantation Development on Cavity-nesting Birds in New Brunswick. The Canadian Field-Naturalist, 120(3), 298. https://doi.org/10.22621/cfn.v120i3.319
Wyatt, S. (2008). First Nations, forest lands, and “aboriginal forestry” in Canada: from exclusion to comanagement and beyond. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1139/X07-214
Wyatt, S., Rousseau, M.-H., Nadeau, S., Thiffault, N., & Guay, L. (2011). Social Concerns, Risk and The Acceptability of Forest Vegetation Management Alternatives: Insights for Managers. The Forestry Chronicle, 87(02), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2011-014
Zamorano-Elgueta, C., Rey Benayas, J. M., Cayuela, L., Hantson, S., & Armenteras, D. (2015). Native forest replacement by exotic plantations in southern Chile (1985–2011) and partial compensation by natural regeneration. Forest Ecology and Management, 345, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.02.025
Zobel, B. J., Wyk, G., & Stahl, P. (1987). Growing exotic forest.
�olak, A. H., Rotherham, I. D., & �alikoglu, M. (2003). Combining ?Naturalness Concepts? with Close-to-Nature Silviculture. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt, 122(6), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-003-0007-1
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.