We present a novel way of estimating embryo lethals using doubled haploid (dihaploid or DH) female gametophytes grown in tissue culture. This DH-based lethals estimate is hypothesized to be lower than the more common method where lethals are estimated from one generation of selfing. The chief reasoning is the early mortality spike observed for selfed embryos of larch and other genera in the Pinaceae. This early mortality spike occurs at the stage when diploid embryos embed into haploid female gametophyte tissue. However, this stage is missing for DH embryos which grow in a petri dish thus the DH lethals estimate is hypothesized to be lower compared to seed counts. This DH estimate is based on 20,000 haploid female gametophytes cultures from which two surviving diploidized embryos were recovered. Lethals based on diploidized haploids (DH) have not been reported for a conifer previously because, aside from larch, only a few conifer species continue female gametophyte development in absence of pollen. Our chief finding is that, contrary to our hypothesis, the DH-based lethals estimate was similar to lethals estimated obtained from selfed seeds in published studies. Thus doubling haploid female gametophytes can be used to estimate embryo lethals when diploidization is conducted on a massive scale.
Bonga, J. M., von Aderkas, P., & James, D. (1988). Potential Application of Haploid Cultures of Tree Species. In Genetic Manipulation of Woody Plants (pp. 57–77). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1661-9_4
Brandvain, Y., Harkness, A., & Pyhäjärvi, T. (2023). Reproductive Compensation and Selection among Viable Embryos Drive the Evolution of Polyembryony. The American Naturalist, 201(5), 694–711. https://doi.org/10.1086/723454
Brandvain, Y., Thomson, L., & Pyhäjärvi, T. (2024). Early-acting inbreeding depression can evolve as an inbreeding avoidance mechanism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 291(2018). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.2467
Ebling, B. (1962). REVIEW. Language Learning, 12(4), 313–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1962.tb01268.x
Haig, D., & Wilczek, A. (2006). Sexual conflict and the alternation of haploid and diploid generations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361(1466), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1794
Kosinski, G. (1982). Genetic load in empty seeds of European larch (Larix decidua Mill (pp. 231–236).
Kosiński, G. (1987). Empty seed production in European larch (Larix decidua). Forest Ecology and Management, 19(1–4), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(87)90033-8
Nagmani, R., & Bonga, J. M. (1985). Embryogenesis in subcultured callus of Larixdecidua. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 15(6), 1088–1091. https://doi.org/10.1139/x85-177
Owens, J. N., & Blake, M. D. (1985). Forest tree seed production. In Information Report-Petawawa National Forestry Institute. Canadian Forestry Service (p. 53).
Owens, J. N., & Molder, M. (1979). Sexual reproduction of Larix occidentalis. Canadian Journal of Botany, 57(23), 2673–2690. https://doi.org/10.1139/b79-317
Park, Y. S., & Fowler, D. P. (1982). Effects of inbreeding and genetic variances in a natural population of tamarack (Larix laricina (Du Roi) K Koch) in eastern Canada. Silv Genet, 31(1), 21–26.
Pattanavibool, R., von Aderkas, P., Hanhijärvi, A., Simola, L. K., & Bonga, J. M. (1995). Diploidization in megagametophyte-derived cultures of the gymnosperm Larix decidua. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 90(5), 671–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222132
Simola, L. K., & Santanen, A. (1990). Improvement of nutrient medium for growth and embryogenesis of megagametophyte and embryo callus lines of Picea abies. Physiologia Plantarum, 80(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1990.800105.x
Singh, H. (1978). Embryology of gymnosperms (p. 302).
Slobodník, B., & Guttenberger, H. (2005). Zygotic embryogenesis and empty seed formation in European larch (Larix decidua Mill.). Annals of Forest Science, 62(2), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005004
Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1978). Statistical methods (p. 593).
Sorensen, F. (1969a). Embryonic Genetic Load in Coastal Douglas-Fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii var. Menziesii. The American Naturalist, 103(932), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1086/282609
Sorensen, F. (1969b). Embryonic Genetic Load in Coastal Douglas-Fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii var. Menziesii. The American Naturalist, 103(932), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1086/282609
Stebbins, G. L. (1950). Variation and Evolution in Plants. https://doi.org/10.7312/steb94536
von Aderkas, P., & Bonga, J. M. (1993). Plants from haploid tissue culture of Lavix decidua. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 87(1–2), 225–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223768
Von Aderkas, P., & Williams, C. (n.d.). Gametophytic apomixis in a gymnosperm, Larix decidua Mill., results in normal male meiosis. REFORESTA, 19, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.21750/refor.19.05.126
Williams, C. G. (1999). Embryonic genetic load for a neotropical conifer, Pinus patula Schiede et Deppe. Journal of Heredity, 90(3), 394–398. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/90.3.394
Williams, C. G. (2007). Re-thinking the embryo lethal system within the Pinaceae. Canadian Journal of Botany, 85(7), 667–677. https://doi.org/10.1139/B07-056
Williams, C. G. (2008). Selfed embryo death inPinus taeda: a phenotypic profile. New Phytologist, 178(1), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02359.x
Williams, C. G., Auckland, L. D., Reynolds, M. M., & Leach, K. A. (2003). Overdominant lethals as part of the conifer embryo lethal system. Heredity, 91(6), 584–592. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800354
Williams, C. G., & Savolainen, O. (1996). Inbreeding Depression in Conifers: Implications for Breeding Strategy. Forest Science, 42(1), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/42.1.102
Williams, C. G., Zhou, Y., & Hall, S. E. (2001). A Chromosomal Region Promoting Outcrossing in a Conifer. Genetics, 159(3), 1283–1289. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/159.3.1283
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
