More articles from Volume 6, Issue 1, 2021
Budburst dynamics of Norway spruce seedlings (Picea abies Karst.) – selection for late spring frosts resistence
Ecological and histological investigation of species complex Diaporthe eres on Fraxinus excelsior seed from Montenegro
Field performance of Austrian pine bareroot seedlings in comparision to seedlings pattern and density in the nursery
The effect of temperature on the Fusarium sambucinum growth from the one-year-old Fraxinus excelsior seedlings in Montenegro
Citations
1
Valeriu-Norocel Nicolescu, Marcin Dyderski, Branislav Cvjetković, Marzena Niemczyk
(2026)
Guidelines for Climate Adaptive Forest Restoration and Reforestation Projects
, ()
10.1016/B978-0-443-34086-4.00001-3Budburst dynamics of Norway spruce seedlings (Picea abies Karst.) – selection for late spring frosts resistence
,
Branislav Cvjetković
,
Milan Mataruga
,
Vanja Daničić
Mirjana Šijačić-Nikolić
Abstract
Norway spruce is one of the most commonly used species for new forest planting in Europe. It is planted in a large number of habitats, often without following the previous results in the success of afforestation. In order to improve Norway spruce afforestation, open field tests were established in which developmental phenophases are monitored. The use of planting material of different provenances, which had not previously been tested for habitat conditions, was often the cause of the decline of newly planted forests. Early budburst of Norway spruce causes losses due to the freezing of terminal buds. Norway spruce testing for different habitat conditions in Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) was conducted at two ecologically different localities: Srebrenica (eastern part of B&H) and Drinić (western part of B&H). During 3 years, the budburst on the seedlings originating from 6 populations (Han Pijesak 1, Han Pijesak 2, Foča, Olovo, Kneževo and Potoci) was monitored. The budburst dynamics was monitored in 2013, 2015 and 2016 and it was recorded for each seedling in two progeny tests. Seedlings from the Kneževo population budbursted the earliest. The seedlings would start budburst on different days of the year, depending partly on the temperature sums and their origin. The earliest budburst was recorded in 2013 (119th day of the year in Srebrenica and 121st day of the year in Drinić). During 2015 and 2016, the budburst started later (125th day in Srebrenica and 129th day in Drinić). Temperature cumulants indicate that a smaller sum of temperatures was required for the buburst in the Srebrenica test than in the Drinić test. However, the temperature sums did not clearly indicate the budburst pattern because they were different for each observed year, but the populations ranking was almost the same. This indicates the influence of some other variables on the budburst. The knowing of the data on the budburst dynamics are a prerequisite for a successful selection of starting populations from which planting material is produced and new forests are later planted. Population Kneževo had the earliest budburst but population Han Pijesak 2 had the latest budburst.
Keywords
References
Aarrestad, P. A., Myking, T., Stabbetorp, O. E. T., & M.M. (2014). Foreign Norway spruce (Picea abies) provenances in Norway and effects on biodiversity. NINA Report, 1075, 1–39.
Allen, M. R., Dube, O. P., Solecki, W., Aragón‐Durand, F., Cramer, W., Humphreys, S., & Zickfeld, K. (2018). Framing and Context In: Global Warming of 1.5 C. In An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of (p. 1).
Azeez, A., & Sane, A. P. (2015). Photoperiodic growth control in perennial trees. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 10(12), e1087631. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2015.1087631
Ballian, D., Bogunić, F., & Božič, G. (n.d.). SMREKA U BOSNI I HERCEGOVINI. Radovi Šumarskog Fakulteta Univerziteta u Sarajevu, 36(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.54652/rsf.2006.v36.i1.191
Ballian, D., Bogunić, F., & Božić, G. (2007). Genetic variability of norway spruce (Picea abies /L./ H. Karst.) in the Bosnian part of the Dinaric mountain range. Šumarski List Br, 5–6, CXXXI, 237–246.
Basler, D., & Körner, C. (2012). Photoperiod sensitivity of bud burst in 14 temperate forest tree species. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 165, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.06.001
Basler, D., & Korner, C. (2014). Photoperiod and temperature responses of bud swelling and bud burst in four temperate forest tree species. Tree Physiology, 34(4), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpu021
Beuker, E. (1994). Adaptation to climatic changes of the timing of bud burst in populations of Pinus sylvestris L. and Picea abies (L.) Karst. Tree Physiology, 14(7-8–9), 961–970. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/14.7-8-9.961
Beuker, E., Valtonen, E., & Repo, T. (1998). Seasonal variation in the frost hardiness of Scots pine and Norway spruce in old provenance experiments in Finland. Forest Ecology and Management, 107(1–3), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00344-7
Busov, V., Carneros, E., & Yakovlev, I. (2016). EARLY BUD-BREAK1 (EBB1) defines a conserved mechanism for control of bud-break in woody perennials. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 11(2), e1073873. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2015.1073873
Carneros, E., Yakovlev, I., Viejo, M., Olsen, J. E., & Fossdal, C. G. (2017). The epigenetic memory of temperature during embryogenesis modifies the expression of bud burst-related genes in Norway spruce epitypes. Planta, 246(3), 553–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-017-2713-9
Čepl, J., Stejskal, J., Korecký, J., Hejtmánek, J., Faltinová, Z., Lstibůrek, M., & Gezan, S. (n.d.). The dehydrins gene expression differs across ecotypes in Norway spruce and relates to weather fluctuations. Scientific Reports, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76900-x
Cvjetkovic, B., Konnert, M., Fussi, B., Mataruga, M., Sijacic-Nikolic, M., Danicic, V., & Lucic, A. (2017). Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) variability in progeny tests in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Genetika, 49(1), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1701259C
Cvjetković, B., Mataruga, M., Šijačić-Nikolić, M., Daničić, V., & Lučić, A. (2015). Bud burst and height increment of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst. In Progeny Tests in Bosnia and Herzegovina, International Conference “Reforestation Challenges.”
Cvjetkovic, B., Mataruga, M., Sijacic-Nikolic, M., Dukic, V., & Popovic, V. (2016). Variability of Norway spruce morphometric characteristics in progeny tests in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Glasnik Sumarskog Fakulteta, 113, 11–34. https://doi.org/10.2298/GSF1613011C
Cvjetković, B., Mataruga, M., Šijačić-Nikolić, M., Ivetić, V., Daničić, V., Stojnić, S., & Stojanović, M. (n.d.). Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) seedlings survival in progeny test “Drinić.” Glasnik Šumarskog Fakulteta Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci, 22, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.7251/GSF1522005C
Fløistad, I. S., & Kohmann, K. (2004). Influence of nutrient supply on spring frost hardiness and time of bud break in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) seedlings. New Forests, 27, 1–11.
Frank, A., Sperisen, C., Howe, G. T., Brang, P., Walthert, L., St.Clair, J. B., & Heiri, C. (2017). Distinct genecological patterns in seedlings of<scp>N</scp>orway spruce and silver fir from a mountainous landscape. Ecology, 98(1), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1632
Frewen, B. E., Chen, T. H. H., Howe, G. T., Davis, J., Rohde, A., Boerjan, W., & Bradshaw, H. D. (2000). Quantitative Trait Loci and Candidate Gene Mapping of Bud Set and Bud Flush in Populus. Genetics, 154(2), 837–845. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/154.2.837
Hannerz, M. (n.d.). Predicting the risk of frost occurrence after budburst of Norway spruce in Sweden. Silva Fennica, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a9175
Hannerz, M., Sonesson, J., & Ekberg, I. (1999). Genetic correlations between growth and growth rhythm observed in a short-term test and performance in long-term field trials of Norway spruce. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29(6), 768–778. https://doi.org/10.1139/x99-056
Hanninen, H. (2006). Climate warming and the risk of frost damage to boreal forest trees: identification of critical ecophysiological traits. Tree Physiology, 26(7), 889–898. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/26.7.889
Hänninen, H., & Tanino, K. (2011). Tree seasonality in a warming climate. Trends in Plant Science, 16(8), 412–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.05.001
Heide, O. M. (1985). Physiological aspects of climatic adaptation in plants with special reference to high-latitude environments. In Plant Production in the North (pp. 1–22).
Heide, O. M. (2003). High autumn temperature delays spring bud burst in boreal trees, counterbalancing the effect of climatic warming. Tree Physiology, 23(13), 931–936. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/23.13.931
Howe, G. T., Aitken, S. N., Neale, D. B., Jermstad, K. D., Wheeler, N. C., & Chen, T. H. (2003). From genotype to phenotype: unraveling the complexities of cold adaptation in forest trees. Canadian Journal of Botany, 81(12), 1247–1266. https://doi.org/10.1139/b03-141
Jansone, B., Neimane, U., Šēnhofa, S., Matisons, R., & Jansons, Ā. (n.d.). Genetically Determined Differences in Annual Shoot Elongation of Young Norway Spruce. Forests, 11(12), 1260. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11121260
Jansson, G., Danusevičius, D., Grotehusman, H., Kowalczyk, J., Krajmerova, D., Skrøppa, T., & Wolf, H. (2013). Norway Spruce (Picea abies (L.) H.Karst.). In Managing Forest Ecosystems (pp. 123–176). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6146-9_3
Johansson, K., Langvall, O., & Bergh, J. (n.d.). Optimization of environmental factors affecting initial growth of Norway spruce seedlings. Silva Fennica, 46(1). https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.64
Johnsen, Ø., Dæhlen, O. G., Østreng, G., & Skrøppa, T. (2005). Daylength and temperature during seed production interactively affect adaptive performance of Picea abies progenies. New Phytologist, 168(3), 589–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01538.x
Junttila, O., & Hanninen, H. (2012). The minimum temperature for budburst in Betula depends on the state of dormancy. Tree Physiology, 32(3), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tps010
Konnert, M., Fady, B., Gömöry, D., A’Hara, S., Wolter, F., Ducci, F., Koskela, J., Bozzano, M., Maaten, T., & Kowalczyk, J. (2015). European Forest Genetic Resources Programme (EUFORGEN). Use and transfer of forest reproductive material in Europe in the context of climate change. In European Forest Genetic Resources Programme (EUFORGEN), Bioversity International (pp. 1–63).
Körner, C., & Basler, D. (2010). Phenology Under Global Warming. Science, 327(5972), 1461–1462. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186473
Krutzsch, P. (1973). Norway spruce development of buds.
Kvaalen, H., & Johnsen, Ø. (2008). Timing of bud set in Picea abies is regulated by a memory of temperature during zygotic and somatic embryogenesis. New Phytologist, 177(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02222.x
Lange, M., Schaber, J., Marx, A., Jäckel, G., Badeck, F.-W., Seppelt, R., & Doktor, D. (2016). Simulation of forest tree species’ bud burst dates for different climate scenarios: chilling requirements and photo-period may limit bud burst advancement. International Journal of Biometeorology, 60(11), 1711–1726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-016-1161-8
Laube, J., Sparks, T. H., Estrella, N., & Menzel, A. (2014). Does humidity trigger tree phenology? Proposal for an air humidity based framework for bud development in spring. New Phytologist, 202(2), 350–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12680
Lee, Y. K., Alexander, D., Wulff, J., & Olsen, J. E. (2014). Changes in metabolite profiles in Norway spruce shoot tips during short-day induced winter bud development and long-day induced bud flush. Metabolomics, 10(5), 842–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-014-0646-x
Lee, Y., Karunakaran, C., Lahlali, R., Liu, X., Tanino, K. K., & Olsen, J. E. (n.d.). Photoperiodic Regulation of Growth-Dormancy Cycling through Induction of Multiple Bud–Shoot Barriers Preventing Water Transport into the Winter Buds of Norway Spruce. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02109
Leinonen, I., & Hänninen, H. (n.d.-a). Adaptation of the timing of bud burst of Norway spruce to temperate and boreal climates. Silva Fennica, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.534
Leinonen, I., & Hänninen, H. (n.d.-b). Adaptation of the timing of bud burst of Norway spruce to temperate and boreal climates. Silva Fennica, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.534
Liu, Q., Piao, S., Janssens, I. A., Fu, Y., Peng, S., Lian, X., Ciais, P., Myneni, R. B., Peñuelas, J., & Wang, T. (n.d.). Extension of the growing season increases vegetation exposure to frost. Nature Communications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02690-y
Lundströmer, J., Karlsson, B., & Berlin, M. (2020). Strategies for deployment of reproductive material under supply limitations – a case study of Norway spruce seed sources in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 35(8), 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2020.1833979
Luoranen, J., & Rikala, R. (n.d.). Nutrient loading of Norway spruce seedlings hastens bud burst and enhances root growth after outplanting. Silva Fennica, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.105
Luoranen, J., & Sutinen, S. (n.d.). Reduced height of short day induced bud scale complex may partly explain early bud burst in Norway spruce seedlings. Silva Fennica, 51(5). https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.7759
Migliavacca, M., Sonnentag, O., Keenan, T. F., Cescatti, A., O’Keefe, J., & Richardson, A. D. (n.d.). On the uncertainty of phenological responses to climate change, and implications for a terrestrial biosphere model. Biogeosciences, 9(6), 2063–2083. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-2063-2012
Milesi, P., Berlin, M., Chen, J., Orsucci, M., Li, L., Jansson, G., Karlsson, B., & Lascoux, M. (2019). Assessing the potential for assisted gene flow using past introduction of Norway spruce in southern Sweden: Local adaptation and genetic basis of quantitative traits in trees. Evolutionary Applications, 12(10), 1946–1959. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12855
Olsen, J. E., Lee, Y., & Junttila, O. (n.d.). Effect of alternating day and night temperature on short day-induced bud set and subsequent bud burst in long days in Norway spruce. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00691
Olsson, C., Olin, S., Lindström, J., & Jönsson, A. M. (2017). Trends and uncertainties in budburst projections of Norway spruce in Northern Europe. Ecology and Evolution, 7(23), 9954–9969. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3476
Partanen, J., Häkkinen, R., & Hänninen, H. (n.d.-a). Significance of the root connection on the dormancy release and vegetative bud burst of Norway spruce (<i>Picea abies</i>) seedlings in relation to accumulated chilling. Silva Fennica, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1443
Partanen, J., Häkkinen, R., & Hänninen, H. (n.d.-b). Significance of the root connection on the dormancy release and vegetative bud burst of Norway spruce (<i>Picea abies</i>) seedlings in relation to accumulated chilling. Silva Fennica, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1443
Partanen, J., Häkkinen, R., Sutinen, S., Viherä-Aarnio, A., Zhang, R., & Hänninen, H. (2021). Endodormancy release in Norway spruce grafts representing trees of different ages. Tree Physiology, 41(4), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpaa001
Partanen, J., H�nninen, H., & H�kkinen, R. (2005). Bud burst in Norway spruce (Picea abies): preliminary evidence for age-specific rest patterns. Trees, 19(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-004-0364-5
Partanen, J., Leinonen, I., & Repo, T. (n.d.). Effect of accumulated duration of the light period on bud burst in Norway spruce (Picea abies) of varying ages. Silva Fennica, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.608
Prescher, F. (1982). Testing av tillväxt rytm och tillväxt förmåga för brukspovenienser av gran. Sverige lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen för skogsproduktion. Rapport, 10, 97.
Rohde, A., & Bhalerao, R. P. (2007). Plant dormancy in the perennial context. Trends in Plant Science, 12(5), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.03.012
Rohde, A., Storme, V., Jorge, V., Gaudet, M., Vitacolonna, N., Fabbrini, F., Ruttink, T., Zaina, G., Marron, N., Dillen, S., Steenackers, M., Sabatti, M., Morgante, M., Boerjan, W., & Bastien, C. (2011). Bud set in poplar – genetic dissection of a complex trait in natural and hybrid populations. New Phytologist, 189(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03469.x
Rötzer, T., & Chmielewski, F. (2001). Phenological maps of Europe. Climate Research, 18, 249–257. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr018249
Skrøppa, T. (1982). Genetic variation in growth rhythm characteristics within and between natural populations of Norway spruce: a preliminary report.
Skrøppa, T. (2003). EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for genetic conservation and use for Norway spruce (Picea abies (pp. 1–6).
Skrøppa, T., Kohmann, K., Johnsen, Ø., Steffenrem, A., & Edvardsen, Ø. M. (2007). Field performance and early test results of offspring from two Norway spruce seed orchards containing clones transferred to warmer climates. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37(3), 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1139/X06-253
Skrøppa, T., & Steffenrem, A. (2016). Selection in a provenance trial of Norway spruce (Picea abiesL. Karst) produced a land race with desirable properties. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 31(5), 439–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.1081983
Skrøppa, T., Tollefsrud, M. M., Sperisen, C., & Johnsen, Ø. (2010). Rapid change in adaptive performance from one generation to the next in Picea abies—Central European trees in a Nordic environment. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 6(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-009-0231-z
Søgaard, G., Granhus, A., & Johnsen, Ø. (2009). Effect of frost nights and day and night temperature during dormancy induction on frost hardiness, tolerance to cold storage and bud burst in seedlings of Norway spruce. Trees, 23(6), 1295–1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-009-0371-7
Sogaard, G., Johnsen, O., Nilsen, J., & Junttila, O. (2008). Climatic control of bud burst in young seedlings of nine provenances of Norway spruce. Tree Physiology, 28(2), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/28.2.311
Solvin, T. M., & Steffenrem, A. (2019). Modelling the epigenetic response of increased temperature during reproduction on Norway spruce phenology. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 34(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2018.1555278
Wallin, E., Gräns, D., Jacobs, D. F., Lindström, A., & Verhoef, N. (2017). Short-day photoperiods affect expression of genes related to dormancy and freezing tolerance in Norway spruce seedlings. Annals of Forest Science, 74(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-017-0655-9
Yakovlev, I. A., Asante, D. K. A., Fossdal, C. G., Partanen, J., Junttila, O., & Johnsen, Ø. (2008). Dehydrins expression related to timing of bud burst in Norway spruce. Planta, 228(3), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-008-0750-0
Yakovlev, I. A., & Fossdal, C. G. (n.d.). In Silico Analysis of Small RNAs Suggest Roles for Novel and Conserved miRNAs in the Formation of Epigenetic Memory in Somatic Embryos of Norway Spruce. Frontiers in Physiology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00674
Yakovlev, I. A., Fossdal, C.-G., Johnsen, Ø., Junttila, O., & Skrøppa, T. (2006). Analysis of gene expression during bud burst initiation in Norway spruce via ESTs from subtracted cDNA libraries. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-005-0031-z
Yakovlev, I. A., Lee, Y., Rotter, B., Olsen, J. E., Skrøppa, T., Johnsen, Ø., & Fossdal, C. G. (2014). Temperature-dependent differential transcriptomes during formation of an epigenetic memory in Norway spruce embryogenesis. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 10(2), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-013-0691-z
Yakovlev, I., Fossdal, C. G., Skrøppa, T., Olsen, J. E., Jahren, A. H., & Johnsen, Ø. (2012). An adaptive epigenetic memory in conifers with important implications for seed production. Seed Science Research, 22(2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258511000535
Citation
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
Google scholar:
See link
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
