Reforestation in Belarus: From the history up to the present time

Vadim Nosnikov
Vadim Nosnikov

Published: 01.07.2017.

Volume 2, Issue 1 (2017)

pp. 90-104;

https://doi.org/10.21750/refor.3.08.32

Abstract

The forest has always played a big part in Belarus. At present it covers about 40% of area of the country`s territory. Predominantly the forests are of natural origin. The main species are Pinus sylvestris L. (Scotch pine), Betula pendula Roth (European white birch) and Picea abies (L.) Karst. (Norway spruce). The other valuable species are Quercus robur L (English oak), Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. (European alder), Larix decidua Mill. (European larch), Abies alba Mill. (Silver fir). The history of the forest management in Belarus showed that over last 150 years the enormous damage to the qualitative and quantitative composition of forests had been made by wars and reconstruction of destroyed industry. The taken reforestation measures allowed to increase the forest area significantly, however, the work on improving of forests` quality requires further development. At present the artificial forest regeneration prevails in the republic. Over the past five years the volumes of established forest plantations range from 21 to 25 thousand hectares annually, the areas of assistance to the natural regeneration – from 4 to 6 thousand hectares annually. By now there are about 1,700 ha of the forest seed orchards, 2,795 plus trees and 1,125 ha of the plus stands in the republic. The cultivation of planting stock for needs of reforestation is carried out on 73 forest tree nurseries with a total area of 1,440 ha. Annually over the last five years there were grown from 270 to 317 million seedlings and transplants, among them 30-35 million seedlings were grown in greenhouses and about 6 million were container seedlings. In order to improve the gene resource and thereby to increase the productivity and quality of future forests, the tendency of forest plantations` prevalence in the reforestation process of Belarus should remain, but in this case the volumes of partial forest plantations should be increased.

Keywords

References

Baghinsky, V. F. (1997). The problems of reforestation in Belarus. The Environmental Resources, 2, 64–71.
Baghinsky, V. F. (2013). The unsanctioned forest felling. Historical Background. The Forest and Hunting Household, 9, 31–37.
Baghinsky, V. F. (2014). The state of affairs, problems and prospects of the main forest exploitation in the Republic of Belarus at the present stage. The Siberian Journal of Forest Science, 2, 7–21.
Baghinsky, V. F., & Esymchik, L. D. (1996). The forest exploitation in Belarus: history, contemporary state, problems and prospects.
Berezenko, N. M., & Pobedov, V. S. (1969). The forests of Belarus.
АD, Y. (2001). The forestry of Belarus – history, economics, problems and prospects of development.
Kruck, N. K., & Ushkevich, G. S. (2008). The forest plantations of Belarus: dynamics, species composition, methods of establishment (1944–2000).The Forest and Hunting Household 3:17-22.
NК, K. (2011). The current state and development trends of reforestation in Belarus. Proceedings of BSTU Forestry, 1, 148 152.
Nosnikov. (2015). Reforestation in Republic of Belarus subject to foreign experience. Proceedings of BSTU, Forestry, 1, 145–148.
Poplavskaya, L. F., Rebko, S. V., & Tupick, P. V. (2011). The growth dynamics of plantation of common pine, specie “Negorelskayaâ€. Proceedings of BSTU, Forestry, 1, 153–152.
Rozhkov, L. N. (2015). The dividing of forests of Belarus into categories of forests` protectiveness. The Forest and Hunting Household, 6, 11–16.
Tarasenko, V. P., Epatjev, V. A., Kruck, N. K., & Holodilova, L. V. (2004). The history of the forest management of Belarus.
The condition of the natural habitat of Belarus. (2016). The Environmental Bulletin.
The Forestry Code of the Republic of Belarus. (2015).

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles