More articles from Volume 2, Issue 1, 2017
Application and use of sulphuric acid pretreatment to improve seed germination of three acacia species
Nutritional diagnoses of oriental beech trees in damaged Caspian forest sites, using the diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS)
Should forest regeneration studies have more replications?
Using double-sampling techniques to reduce the number of measurement trees during forest inventories
Comparison of seedling quality between autochthonous and poplar clones
Citations
12
Manuela Rodríguez-Romero, Alejandro Gallardo, Fernando Pulido
(2020)
Geographical and within-population variation of constitutive chemical defences in a Mediterranean oak (Quercus ilex)
Forest Systems, 29(2)
10.5424/fs/2020292-16943
Vladan Ivetić
(2021)
Life on Land
Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, ()
10.1007/978-3-319-95981-8_91
Willian Naves Duarte, Jean Carlos Cardoso
(2024)
Overcoming dormancy in Rubus sellowii Cham. & Schlitdl. seeds, an endemic species to Brazil
Journal of Seed Science, 46()
10.1590/2317-1545v46291909
Branislav Cvjetković, Milan Mataruga
(2020)
Life on Land
Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, ()
10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_113-1
Branislav Cvjetković, Milan Mataruga
(2021)
Life on Land
Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, ()
10.1007/978-3-319-95981-8_113
Jelena Milovanovic, Marina Nonic, Vladan Ivetic, Vladan Popovic, Aleksandar Lucic, Mirjana Sijacic-Nikolic
(2022)
Integration of national activities in international initiatives for the conservation of forest genetic resources
Glasnik Sumarskog fakulteta, (125)
10.2298/GSF2225007M
Alfredo Ortiz-Martínez, Alejandra Moreno-Letelier, Patricia Delgado-Valerio, Daniel Piñero, Carlos Ortiz-Martínez, Alejandra Vázquez-Lobo
(2024)
Diversidad genética en las pináceas de Norteamérica: una revisión actual
Ecosistemas, ()
10.7818/ECOS.2725
Alice Di Sacco, Kate A. Hardwick, David Blakesley, Pedro H. S. Brancalion, Elinor Breman, Loic Cecilio Rebola, Susan Chomba, Kingsley Dixon, Stephen Elliott, Godfrey Ruyonga, Kirsty Shaw, Paul Smith, Rhian J. Smith, Alexandre Antonelli
(2021)
Ten golden rules for reforestation to optimize carbon sequestration, biodiversity recovery and livelihood benefits
Global Change Biology, 27(7)
10.1111/gcb.15498
Vladan Ivetić
(2019)
Life on Land
Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, ()
10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_91-1
Chonur Mohammadi, Nasrin Seyedi, Babak Abdollahi Mandoulakani, Maria Filomena Caeiro
(2021)
Genetic Diversity in Natural Populations and Cultivated Stands of Walnut (Juglans regia L.) Using Microsatellite Marker
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 64()
10.1590/1678-4324-2021200745
Viktor SaushkinВиктор Саушкин, A. Novikov, Артур Новиков,
(2018)
INFRARED RANGE SPECTROSCOPY: THE STUDY OF THE PINE SEED COAT PARAMETERS
Forestry Engineering Journal, 8(3)
10.12737/article_5b97a164e41782.20107217
Jei-Wan Lee, Ji-Young Ahn, Kyungmi Lee
(2026)
Genetic variation among Larix kaempferi (Lamb.) Carrière plantations in South Korea based on microsatellite markers: implications for seed productivity
Forest Science and Technology, ()
10.1080/21580103.2026.2616449Concerns and evidence on genetic diversity in planted forests
,
Vladan Ivetić
Jovana Devetaković
Abstract
Planted forests are an important source of various services (economic, environmental, and social) with increasing portion in the total world’s forest area. Genetic diversity is fundamental for success and sustainability of planted forests. Facing the concern of the reduction of genetic diversity in planted forests, this study offers a review of evidence on comparisons between the levels of genetic diversity in forests established by different regeneration methods. A total of 34 papers comparing genetic diversity in natural forests versus various regeneration methods of 24 tree species examined by the range of markers are reviewed. In most cases, there are no significant differences in genetic diversity between natural and planted forests, followed by an almost equal number of cases with decreased and increased level of genetic diversity. The loss of rare alleles, but also new alleles are reported in planted forests. Although the origin of planting material in the most cases are unknown, the size of parental population is determinant for the level of genetic diversity in the new forest, with the provenancing and seed collection strategy as the most important management practices in planting projects.
Keywords
References
Adams, W. T., Zuo, J., Shimizu, J. Y., & Tappeiner, J. C. (1998). Impact of Alternative Regeneration Methods on Genetic Diversity in Coastal Douglas-Fir. Forest Science, 44(3), 390–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/44.3.390
AL-HAWIJA, B. N., WAGNER, V., & HENSEN, I. (2014). Genetic comparison between natural and planted populations of Pinus brutia and Cupressus sempervirens in Syria. TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, 38, 267–280. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1211-24
Breed, M. F., Stead, M. G., Ottewell, K. M., Gardner, M. G., & Lowe, A. J. (2013). Which provenance and where? Seed sourcing strategies for revegetation in a changing environment. Conservation Genetics, 14(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-012-0425-z
Broadhurst, L. M., Lowe, A., Coates, D. J., Cunningham, S. A., McDonald, M., Vesk, P. A., & Yates, C. (2008). Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential. Evolutionary Applications, 1(4), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00045.x
Brockerhoff, E. G., Jactel, H., Parrotta, J. A., Quine, C. P., & Sayer, J. (2008). Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodiversity and Conservation, 17(5), 925–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9380-x
Buiteveld, J., Vendramin, G. G., Leonardi, S., Kamer, K., & Geburek, T. (2007). Genetic diversity and differentiation in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands varying in management history. Forest Ecology and Management, 247(1–3), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.018
Burgarella, C., Navascués, M., Soto, Á., Lora, Á., & Fici, S. (2007). Narrow genetic base in forest restoration with holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) in Sicily. Annals of Forest Science, 64(7), 757–763. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2007055
Carnus, J.-M., Parrotta, J. A., Brockerhoff, E. G., Arbez, M., Jactel, H., Kremer, A., Lamb, D., O’Hara, K., & Walters, B. B. (2006). Planted forests and biodiversity. J Forest, 104(2), 65–77.
Cottrell, J. E., Munro, R. C., Tabbener, H. E., Milner, A. D., Forrest, G. I., & Lowe, A. J. (2003). Comparison of fine-scale genetic structure using nuclear microsatellites within two British oakwoods differing in population history. Forest Ecology and Management, 176(1–3), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00289-X
Dostálek, J., Frantík, T., & Lukášová, M. (2011). Genetic differences within natural and planted stands of Quercus petraea. Open Life Sciences, 6(4), 597–605. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-011-0034-8
Eriksson, G., Bozzano, M., Jalonen, R., Thomas, E., Boshier, D., Gallo, L., Cavers, S., Bordács, S., Smith, P., & Loo, J. (2014). Collection of propagation material in the absence of genetic knowledge. In State of the World’s Forest Genetic Resources – Thematic Study.
Evans, J. (2009). The history of tree planting and planted forests. In Planted forests: uses, impacts and sustainability (pp. 5–22). https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845935641.0005
Evans, J., Carle, J. B., & Lungo, A. del. (2009). The question of definitions. In Planted forests: uses, impacts and sustainability (pp. 23–31). https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845935641.0023
Fageria, M. S., & Rajora, O. P. (2014). Effects of silvicultural practices on genetic diversity and population structure of white spruce in Saskatchewan. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 10(2), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-013-0682-0
F.A.O. (2015). Global forest resources assessment 2015 Desk reference. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 244.
Ferreira, D. K., Nazareno, A. G., Mantovani, A., Bittencourt, R., Sebbenn, A. M., & dos Reis, M. S. (2012). Genetic analysis of 50-year old Brazilian pine (Araucaria angustifolia) plantations: implications for conservation planning. Conservation Genetics, 13(2), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-011-0296-8
Finkeldey, R., & Ziehe, M. (2004). Genetic implications of silvicultural regimes. Forest Ecology and Management, 197(1–3), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.036
García Gil, M. R., Floran, V., Östlund, L., Mullin, T. J. “Tim,” & Andersson Gull, B. (2015). Genetic diversity and inbreeding in natural and managed populations of Scots pine. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-015-0850-5
Gauli, A., Gailing, O., Stefenon, V. M., & Finkeldey, R. (2009). Genetic similarity of natural populations and plantations of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. in Nepal. Annals of Forest Science, 66(7), 703–703. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009053
Gömöry, D. (1992). Effect of stand origin on the genetic diversity of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) populations. Forest Ecology and Management, 54(1–4), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(92)90014-Z
Griffin, A. R. (2014). Clones or improved seedlings of Eucalyptus? Not a simple choice. International Forestry Review, 16(2), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554814811724793
Hufford, K. M., & Mazer, S. J. (2003). Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18(3), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00002-8
Huh, M. K., & Huh, H. W. (n.d.). Genetic diversity and population structure of silk tree (Albizia julibrissin Durazz.) in Korea. Forest Genet, 7(1), 1–9.
Humphrey, J. W., Ferris, R., Peace, A. J., & Jukes, M. R. (2001). Biodiversity in planted forests. Forest Research Annual Report and Accounts.
I.C.P.F. (n.d.). Planted forests are a vital resource for future green economies. In Summary report of the 3rd International Congress on Planted Forests.http://www.fao.org/forestry/37902-083cc16479b4b28d8d4873338b79bef41.pdf.
Ivetić, V., & Devetaković, J. (n.d.). Reforestation challenges in Southeast Europe facing climate change. REFORESTA, 1, 178–220. https://doi.org/10.21750/10.21750/REFOR.1.10.10
Ivetić, V., Devetaković, J., Nonić, M., Stanković, D., & Šijačić-Nikolić, M. (n.d.). Genetic diversity and forest reproductive material - from seed source selection to planting. IForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 9(5), 801–812. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1577-009
Jeandroz, S., Collignon, A. M., & Favre, J. M. (2004). RAPD and mtDNA variation among autochthonous and planted populations of Picea abies from the Vosges mountains (France) in reference to other French populations. Forest Ecology and Management, 197(1–3), 225–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.015
Kelty, M. J. (2006). The role of species mixtures in plantation forestry. Forest Ecology and Management, 233(2–3), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.011
Konnert, M., & Ruetz, W. (2006). Genetic aspects of artificial regeneration of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) in Bavaria. European Journal of Forest Research, 125(3), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-006-0116-8
Korshikov, I. I., Ducci, F., Terliga, N. S., Bychkov, S. A., & Gorlova, E. M. (2004). Allozyme variation of Pinus pallasiana D. Don in Natural Crimean populations and in plantations in technogenously-polluted areas of the Ukraine steppes. Annals of Forest Science, 61(5), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2004032
Kosinska, J., Lewandowski, A., & Chalupka, W. (n.d.). Genetic variability of Scots pine maternal populations and their progenies. Silva Fennica, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.304
Koskela, J., Vinceti, B., Dvorak, W., Bush, D., Dawson, I. K., Loo, J., Kjaer, E. D., Navarro, C., Padolina, C., Bordács, S., Jamnadass, R., Graudal, L., & Ramamonjisoa, L. (2014). Utilization and transfer of forest genetic resources: A global review. Forest Ecology and Management, 333, 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.017
Koski, V. (n.d.). A note on genetic diversity in natural populations and cultivated stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Forest Systems, 9, 89–95. https://doi.org/10.5424/677
Kremer, A., Ronce, O., Robledo‐Arnuncio, J. J., Guillaume, F., Bohrer, G., Nathan, R., Bridle, J. R., Gomulkiewicz, R., Klein, E. K., Ritland, K., Kuparinen, A., Gerber, S., & Schueler, S. (2012). Long‐distance gene flow and adaptation of forest trees to rapid climate change. Ecology Letters, 15(4), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01746.x
Laikre, L., Schwartz, M. K., Waples, R. S., & Ryman, N. (2010). Compromising genetic diversity in the wild: unmonitored large-scale release of plants and animals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(9), 520–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.06.013
Larjavaara, M. (2008). A Review on Benefits and Disadvantages of Tree Diversity. The Open Forest Science Journal, 1(1), 24–26. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874398600801010024
Lee, S. (n.d.). Mating system parameters of Dryobalanops aromatica Gaertn. f. (Dipterocarpaceae) in three different forest types and a seed orchard. Heredity, 85(4), 338–345. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00761.x
Lefèvre, F. (2004). Human impacts on forest genetic resources in the temperate zone: an updated review. Forest Ecology and Management, 197(1–3), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.017
LI, Y., CHEN, X., ZHANG, X., WU, T., LU, H., & CAI, Y. (2005). Genetic Differences between Wild and Artificial Populations of Metasequoia glyptostroboides : Implications for Species Recovery. Conservation Biology, 19(1), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00025.x
Lindenmayer, D. B., Hobbs, R. J., & Salt, D. (2003). Plantation forests and biodiversity conservation. Australian Forestry, 66(1), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2003.10674891
Lindgren, D. (n.d.). The role of tree breeding in reforestation. REFORESTA, 1, 221–237. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.1.11.11
Macdonald, S. E., Thomas, B. R., Cherniawsky, D. M., & Purdy, B. G. (2001). Managing genetic resources of lodgepole pine in west-central Alberta: patterns of isozyme variation in natural populations and effects of forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 152(1–3), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00616-2
Mason, W. L., & Connolly, T. (2014). Mixtures with spruce species can be more productive than monocultures: evidence from the Gisburn experiment in Britain. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 87(2), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpt042
Medri, C., Ruas, P. M., Higa, A. R., Murakami, M., & Fatima Raus, C. (2003). Effects of forest management on the genetic diversity in a population of Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Kuntze. Silvae Genet, 52, 202–205.
Müller-Starck, G., Herzog, S., & Hattemer, H. (1993). Intra- and interpopulational genetic variation in juvenile populations of Quercus robur L and Quercus petraea Liebl. Annales Des Sciences Forestières, 50(Supplement), 233s–244s. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19930723
Muona, O., Yazdani, R., & Rudin, D. (1987). Genetic change between life stages in Pinus sylvestris: allozyme variation in seeds and planted seeldings. Silvae Genet, 35, 39–42.
Namroud, M., Bousquet, J., Doerksen, T., & Beaulieu, J. (2012). Scanning SNPs from a large set of expressed genes to assess the impact of artificial selection on the undomesticated genetic diversity of white spruce. Evolutionary Applications, 5(6), 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00242.x
Navascués, M., & Emerson, B. C. (2007). Natural recovery of genetic diversity by gene flow in reforested areas of the endemic Canary Island pine, Pinus canariensis. Forest Ecology and Management, 244(1–3), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.009
O.E.C.D. (2013). OECD guidelines on the production of forest reproductive materials. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Trade and Agriculture Directorate. 24.
Pacalaj, M., Gömöry, D., & Longauer, R. (2011). Modelling the effects of natural and artificial regeneration on genetic structure. 1. Pure spruce stand. Lesnícky Casopis - Forestry Journal, 57(2). https://doi.org/10.2478/v10114-011-0004-0
Pandey, M., Gailing, O., Leinemann, L., & Finkeldey, R. (2004). Molecular markers provide evidence for long-distance planting material transfer during plantation establishment of Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. in Nepal. Annals of Forest Science, 61(6), 603–606. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2004056
Payn, T., Carnus, J., Freer-Smith, P., Orazio, C., & Nabuurs, G.-J. (2014). Third International Congress on Planted Forests: Planted Forests on the Globe - Renewable Resources for the Future. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 44(Suppl 1), S1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1179-5395-44-S1-S1
Pelleri, F., S., R., Bianchetto, E., & Bidini, C. (2013). Comparing growth rate in a mixed plantation (walnut, poplar and nurse trees) with different planting designs: results from an experimental plantation in northern Italy. Annals of Silvicultural Research, 37(1), 13–21.
Pospíšková, M., & Dostálek, J. (2009). Impact of forest management on genetic diversity of Quercus petraea populations: a case study from the Křivoklátsko Protected Landscape Area (Czech Republic). Biodiversity: Research and Conservation, 13(2009), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10119-009-0007-1
Prober, S. M., Byrne, M., McLean, E. H., Steane, D. A., Potts, B. M., Vaillancourt, R. E., & Stock, W. D. (n.d.). Climate-adjusted provenancing: a strategy for climate-resilient ecological restoration. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2015.00065
Raja, R. G., Tauer, C. G., & Wittwer, R. F. (n.d.). Huang Y(1998) Regeneration methods affect genetic variation and structure in Shortleaf Pine (Pinus echinata Mill. Forest Genet, 5, 171–178.
Rajora, O. P. (1999). Genetic biodiversity impacts of silvicultural practices and phenotypic selection in white spruce. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 99(6), 954–961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051402
Rajora, O. P., & Pluhar, S. A. (2003). Genetic diversity impacts of forest fires, forest harvesting, and alternative reforestation practices in black spruce (Picea mariana). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 106(7), 1203–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-1169-9
Ratnam, W., Rajora, O. P., Finkeldey, R., Aravanopoulos, F., Bouvet, J.-M., Vaillancourt, R. E., Kanashiro, M., Fady, B., Tomita, M., & Vinson, C. (2014). Genetic effects of forest management practices: Global synthesis and perspectives. Forest Ecology and Management, 333, 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.008
Renau‐Morata, B., Nebauer, S. G., Sales, E., Allainguillaume, J., Caligari, P., & Segura, J. (2005). Genetic diversity and structure of natural and managed populations of Cedrus atlantica (Pinaceae) assessed using random amplified polymorphic DNA. American Journal of Botany, 92(5), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.5.875
Saenz-Romero, C., Snively, A. E., & Lindig-Cisneros, R. (2003). Conservation and restoration of pine forest genetic resources in Mexico. Silvae Genet, 52, 233–237.
Sgrò, C. M., Lowe, A. J., & Hoffmann, A. A. (2011). Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change. Evolutionary Applications, 4(2), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00157.x
Shimizu, J. Y., & Adams, W. T. (n.d.). The effect of alternate silvicultural systems on genetic diversity in Douglas-fir. Proceedings, 22nd Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference; June 14–17.
Skrøppa, T. (n.d.). Impacts of tree improvement on genetic structure and diversity of planted forests. Silva Fennica, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a9179
Stanturf, J. A., Palik, B. J., & Dumroese, R. K. (2014). Contemporary forest restoration: A review emphasizing function. Forest Ecology and Management, 331, 292–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.029
Stefenon, V. M., Gailing, O., & Finkeldey, R. (2008). Genetic structure of plantations and the conservation of genetic resources of Brazilian pine (Araucaria angustifolia). Forest Ecology and Management, 255(7), 2718–2725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.036
Tani, A., Maltoni, A., Mariotti, B., & Buresti Lattes, E. (n.d.). Juglans regia L. tree plantations for wood production in mining area of S. Barbara (AR). Evaluation of N-fixing accessory trees effect. Forest@ - Rivista Di Selvicoltura Ed Ecologia Forestale, 3(4), 588–597. https://doi.org/10.3832/efor0407-0030588
Thomas, B. R., Macdonald, S. E., Hicks, M., Adams, D. L., & Hodgetts, R. B. (1999). Effects of reforestation methods on genetic diversity of lodgepole pine: an assessment using microsatellite and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 98(5), 793–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051136
Thomas, E., Jalonen, R., Loo, J., Boshier, D., Gallo, L., Cavers, S., Bordács, S., Smith, P., & Bozzano, M. (2014). Genetic considerations in ecosystem restoration using native tree species. Forest Ecology and Management, 333, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.015
Tomaru, N., Y, T., & Ohba, K. (1992). Allozyme variation in artificial stands and a plus-tree group of sugi, Cryptomeria japonica in Ibaraki Prefecture. J Jpn Forest Soc, 74, 44–48.
Uchida, K., Tomaru, N., Tomaru, C., Yamamoto, C., & Ohba, K. (1997). Allozyme Variation in Natural Populations of Hinoki, Chamaecyparis obtusa (SIEB. et ZUCC.) ENDL. and Its Comparison with the Plus-trees Selected from Artificial Stands. Japanese Journal of Breeding, 47(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs1951.47.7
Wang, Z.-S., Liu, H., Wei, N., Xu, W.-X., & An, S.-Q. (2010). Contribution of progeny cohorts to the restoration of genetic diversity in the post-harvest dragon spruce (Picea asperata) stands. Forestry, 83(3), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpq013
Zhang, D., & Stanturf, J. (2008). Forest Plantations. In Encyclopedia of Ecology (pp. 1673–1680). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00331-1
Zhang, X., Chen, X.-Y., & Zhang, D. (2006). Effect of Regeneration Method on RAPD-Based Genetic Variation of Cyclobalanopsis glauca (Fagaceae). New Forests, 32(3), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-006-9008-5
Citation
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
Google scholar:
See link
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
