More articles from Volume 2, Issue 1, 2017
Application and use of sulphuric acid pretreatment to improve seed germination of three acacia species
Nutritional diagnoses of oriental beech trees in damaged Caspian forest sites, using the diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS)
Should forest regeneration studies have more replications?
Using double-sampling techniques to reduce the number of measurement trees during forest inventories
Comparison of seedling quality between autochthonous and poplar clones
Citations
2
Salvatore F. Papandrea, Stanimir Stoilov, Georgi Angelov, Tanya Panicharova, Piotr S. Mederski, Andrea R. Proto
(2023)
Modeling Productivity and Estimating Costs of Processor Tower Yarder in Shelterwood Cutting of Pine Stand
Forests, 14(2)
10.3390/f14020195
Mariya Belovarska, Denitsa Pandeva, Svilena Bozhinova, Emil Popov, Petar Zhelev
(2019)
Forests of Southeast Europe Under a Changing Climate
Advances in Global Change Research, 65()
10.1007/978-3-319-95267-3_12Afforestation in Bulgaria
Abstract
The historical development of afforestations in Bulgaria was investigated. Some of the more important decisions and events which determine the correct state policy in the field of afforestations are pointed out. The most significant achievements are in: erosion control, incl. water tank protection from silting up; increasing the tree volume and forest growth; protection of agriculture via forest protection belts; landscape improving. The social importance for more employment and improvement of means of livelihood is mentioned. Proved reasons for decreasing the afforested areas since 1980s are given. The main mistakes and problems are mentioned as well as the changes in the afforestation policy and future challenges.
Keywords
References
Citation
Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.