Comparison of acute cardiovascular responses during a rowing test in laboratory and field conditions

Abstract

This study compares the acute cardiovascular responses of rowing athletes during a rowing test in laboratory and field conditions in order to identify possible differences between the two types of the rowing tests. Six male rowers completed the rowing tests, using the Concept2 rowing paddle at the laboratory and a skiff in the water. Heart rate, blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) and oxygen saturation (% SpO2) were measured in both tests. Data analysis showed no significant differences regarding the heart rate (p > 0.05), systolic blood pressure (p > 0.05) and the oxygen saturation rate (p > 0.05) between the laboratory and field trials, while a similar evolution of these parameter values was recorded at all times when the measurements were taken. Only at diastolic pressure values, there were statistically significant differences in the measurements taken immediately post the rowing test and the values obtained up to the 7th minute of the recovery. Overall, there were only slight fluctuations in the cardiovascular responses of the rowing athletes, between the laboratory test and the field test, and the laboratory test may be quite reliable for the performance assessment of the rowers. However, field trials are reported to have the advantage of offering greater validity and specificity because they better simulate actual competition events.

References

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics