×
Home
Current Archive Submission Guidelines
News Contact
Research paper

An analysis of laboratory parameters of chronic kidney failure in elderly patients

By
Edhem Hasković ,
Edhem Hasković
Harun Uzunalıć ,
Harun Uzunalıć
Snežana Unčanin ,
Snežana Unčanin
Safija Herenda ,
Safija Herenda
Denis Hasković ,
Denis Hasković
Amina Selimović
Amina Selimović

Abstract

Aim: The chief aim of this study was monitoring of laboratory parameters of chronic kidney failure in elderly patients. Methods: All samples were taken and processed by standard methods and according to the principles of good laboratory practice. Data were collected in an organized and systematic manner in the form of a questionnaire with respect to ethical principles and as such were analyzed by statistical tests and analyses (Student's t-test, Analysis of variance-ANOVA, Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients). The limit of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Mean values of creatinine clearance and proteinuria for the total study population were: 41.30 ± 21.43 mL/min, 1.5 ± 2.3 g/L/24 h, respectively. Hematological parameters did not significantly differ from normal values. The highest frequency of comorbidities was observed in subjects aged ≥ 80 years with an average of 2.03 comorbidities per subject. Serum creatinine and urea values as well as creatinine clearance are good indicators of disease progression. Conclusion: The results of the presented research suggest that old age is a predisposing risk factor for the development of chronic kidney disease, and that in combination with comorbidities (hypertension and/or diabetes), it contributes to poor prognosis or disease progression.

References

1.
Radišić Biljak V, Honović L, Matica J, Krešić B, Šimić Vojak S. The role of laboratory testing in detection and classification of chronic kidney disease: national recommendations. Biochemia Medica. :153–76.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.